Knicks · Gamethread: @ Toronto 730 MSG (page 8)

BigDaddyG @ 12/11/2024 12:10 AM
Rookie wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Rookie wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Rookie wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
Philc1 wrote:KAT so soft!

SO SOFT!!!

Choose the form of you’re destroyer

Ray, were you thinking of the stay puff marshmallow man?


Classic. I own that movie in almost every format except the PSP UMD.

Rick Moranus tried to pick up my ex wife at Nuts About You, a health food store on the upper West side back in the day. Come to think of it, he could have done me a huge favor if he had a stronger rap. He should have probably led with I am the key master

Pre Honey I Shrunk the kids? If not, it might've been a wrap.

lol you have socks and underwear older than me 🤣😁😂

Never have to worry about that.

Alpha1971 @ 12/11/2024 3:13 AM
Ron Darling, when he was a Met, saw my wife in Manhattan and was like " Ay Mami, do fries come with that shake ". She is a Mets fan and told me about him spotting her in Manhattan back in the day. She was used to unwanted attention from men and gave him the " Talk to the hand " out of habit, the she realized he looked familiar, then said " That was Ron Darling " but kept it moving, cause " He would likely be after only one thing ". Unlike me who met her years later and put a ring on it, in the traditional Christian way, that she demanded. Good girl my wife
martin @ 12/11/2024 9:45 AM
VDesai wrote:BTW I'm not sure if we had a timeout left or not in that scenario. If we did, I'm really not sure why we didn't use it. Maybe given the clock situation, Thibs thought Toronto would foul (we got possession with 25.1 left so the Raptors would have been pretty limited on time to tie it without fouling - and I also don't know how many timeouts they had). That said it works out and I think you have to give KAT a lot of credit for positioning and conviction to shoot to save us in that situation, as we seemed rather aimless.

This is a good scenario from both coaching and players perspective. Thibs could have called TO but there is really no reason to burn the TO if there is a possibility that Toronto fouls? You definitely would like to burn some clock. You call a TO to get Brunson in and Raps also get a chance to sub out there version of Brunson and bring back in their defensive guys and to set their defense, and you also then need to get the ball in play, which the Knicks sometimes SUCK at.

What we would expect is for someone - maybe KAT or Deuce or Mikal - to organize the offense. That seems to have been missed?

EwingsGlass @ 12/11/2024 9:48 AM
martin wrote:
VDesai wrote:BTW I'm not sure if we had a timeout left or not in that scenario. If we did, I'm really not sure why we didn't use it. Maybe given the clock situation, Thibs thought Toronto would foul (we got possession with 25.1 left so the Raptors would have been pretty limited on time to tie it without fouling - and I also don't know how many timeouts they had). That said it works out and I think you have to give KAT a lot of credit for positioning and conviction to shoot to save us in that situation, as we seemed rather aimless.

This is a good scenario from both coaching and players perspective. Thibs could have called TO but there is really no reason to burn the TO if there is a possibility that Toronto fouls? You definitely would like to burn some clock. You call a TO to get Brunson in and Raps also get a chance to sub out there version of Brunson and bring back in their defensive guys and to set their defense, and you also then need to get the ball in play, which the Knicks sometimes SUCK at.

What we would expect is for someone - maybe KAT or Deuce or Mikal - to organize the offense. That seems to have been missed?

Hah. I am trying to figure out why they are so shitty at inbounding the ball. They are really bad at it.

Page 8 of 8