Oh and the obvious switch where KAT stymied Trae and forced the travel
It is a good sign that we got a lot of fouls, it means we are defending..... more defence more fouls..... but i will take it over No Defence Less Fouls any time of the day
Clean wrote:We also attacked Trae some and made him work on defense. We usually let him hide on someone in the corner.
I would have liked if we attacked him more, Have Bridges take him down low almost every time and hit that sweet 4' fadeaway.
Dragon wrote:It is a good sign that we got a lot of fouls, it means we are defending..... more defence more fouls..... but i will take it over No Defence Less Fouls any time of the day
Agree, that's what I was implying when I said make 'em feel you. The Knicks were more aggressive at the point of attack and on the ballhandler and forced more turnovers. More fouls, but the fouls didn't hurt them when it mattered (i.e. didn't just give away free points at the end of the game). I thought the officiating in this one was brutal, but I'm glad they stayed aggressive on ball. Mikal rested way more and was effective in a much shorter run - I'm not sure how much those two things have to do with each other, but you gotta think it does have some correlation.
