Mitch got start making his free throws at least 60 percent that’s. If the Knicks are down 6 to 8 points and Mitch gets fouled misses free throws then they hit 2 threes and down 14 because I will break something in my house. I can’t take this miss free throw nonsense it will be worse if he in final seconds gets fouled down by 1 point and misses both free throws. At some point Mitch has to take responsibility for this bad free throw shooting he really does.
None of you didn't love Phoebe Cates ?
houston20 wrote:Mitch got start making his free throws at least 60 percent that’s. If the Knicks are down 6 to 8 points and Mitch gets fouled misses free throws then they hit 2 threes and down 14 because I will break something in my house. I can’t take this miss free throw nonsense it will be worse if he in final seconds gets fouled down by 1 point and misses both free throws. At some point Mitch has to take responsibility for this bad free throw shooting he really does.
He has been in the league forever. He has not improved a single thing in his game. Still brings the ball down low after he gets it, still is atrocious at the line, still not a single post move, no jumper, no hook, no bank shot, nothing. He is not improving his free throws at this point
ramtour420 wrote:houston20 wrote:Mitch got start making his free throws at least 60 percent that’s. If the Knicks are down 6 to 8 points and Mitch gets fouled misses free throws then they hit 2 threes and down 14 because I will break something in my house. I can’t take this miss free throw nonsense it will be worse if he in final seconds gets fouled down by 1 point and misses both free throws. At some point Mitch has to take responsibility for this bad free throw shooting he really does.
He has been in the league forever. He has not improved a single thing in his game. Still brings the ball down low after he gets it, still is atrocious at the line, still not a single post move, no jumper, no hook, no bank shot, nothing. He is not improving his free throws at this point
I definitely agree with you that Mitch has bad offensive game obviously that is not going to change right now but his free throw shooting has to or might get traded if the knicks lose this series.
I thought as a group we didn’t bring any intensity to disrupt the flow of the game … we have to get our wing stop going offensively early. It’s been a lot of iso we are best when we move the ball around . If we want to win, we need OG to contribute and be apart of the offensive flow.
Same for bridges
If these guys have complete games we are very hard to beat. As they usually always compete defensively.
Chandler wrote:We will wing game 4!!
Will there be blue cheese?
ToddTT wrote:Chandler wrote:We will wing game 4!!
Will there be blue cheese?
For the wingstop wings? I’m a blue cheese fan, and I gotta have a lager with it
Give La Peral blue cheese a try. Very creamy and a little sharp. Had it recently when I ate dinner across from Mazzulla, Cassel and the Celtics co-owners during the Orlando-Boston series.
Philc1 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:Let me add - you can see the D is not all on Kat because when you watch the clip of the Celtics 1st half 3’s there are multiple instances where the guy guarding the ball is fighting to get over the screen.If we were switching there is no fighting over the screen it’s a simple player hand-off / exchange.
Because if you fight over a screen Porzingis would flop like the Trump stock market.
Point is - if you see Knick defender going over the top that = we are in drop coverage.
If we were switching on ball defender would just stop on screen.
I'm saying if you see on ball defender go over top on screen and Kat dropping -- that's not Kat that is a drop call by coach.
gradyandrew wrote:It just seems the Knicks are less than the sum of their parts.
Kind of true isn't it.
Why though - given we have 3 really good role players playing 2-4?
System? PG who is really a scorer 1st and 2nd?
Or maybe collectively we just don't have the ball handlers and passers who can get shots on their own -- this may be real reason.
jaydh wrote:Give La Peral blue cheese a try. Very creamy and a little sharp. Had it recently when I ate dinner across from Mazzulla, Cassel and the Celtics co-owners during the Orlando-Boston series.
I hope you gave Cassell your best stink eye.
Alpha1971 wrote:None of you didn't love Phoebe Cates ?
I was trying to think of examples - she's definitely on ANY list.
houston20 wrote:ramtour420 wrote:houston20 wrote:Mitch got start making his free throws at least 60 percent that’s. If the Knicks are down 6 to 8 points and Mitch gets fouled misses free throws then they hit 2 threes and down 14 because I will break something in my house. I can’t take this miss free throw nonsense it will be worse if he in final seconds gets fouled down by 1 point and misses both free throws. At some point Mitch has to take responsibility for this bad free throw shooting he really does.
He has been in the league forever. He has not improved a single thing in his game. Still brings the ball down low after he gets it, still is atrocious at the line, still not a single post move, no jumper, no hook, no bank shot, nothing. He is not improving his free throws at this point
I definitely agree with you that Mitch has bad offensive game obviously that is not going to change right now but his free throw shooting has to or might get traded if the knicks lose this series.
He was going to get traded before this series - even with his crappy FTs he may keeping himself on team with his recent play.
fitzfarm wrote:I thought as a group we didn’t bring any intensity to disrupt the flow of the game … we have to get our wing stop going offensively early. It’s been a lot of iso we are best when we move the ball around . If we want to win, we need OG to contribute and be apart of the offensive flow. Same for bridges
If these guys have complete games we are very hard to beat. As they usually always compete defensively.
YES - we were not forceful defensively early -- kind of passive and game was gone.
LivingLegend wrote:gradyandrew wrote:It just seems the Knicks are less than the sum of their parts.
Kind of true isn't it.
Why though - given we have 3 really good role players playing 2-4?
System? PG who is really a scorer 1st and 2nd?
Or maybe collectively we just don't have the ball handlers and passers who can get shots on their own -- this may be real reason.
That’s it for me.
Oh wait, your ball handling point too
fishmike wrote:In MSG down 0-2 they are heavy favorites to win on the road.Fascinating.
So um it's safe to say Boston covered the spread, eh?
martin wrote:LivingLegend wrote:gradyandrew wrote:It just seems the Knicks are less than the sum of their parts.
Kind of true isn't it.
Why though - given we have 3 really good role players playing 2-4?
System? PG who is really a scorer 1st and 2nd?
Or maybe collectively we just don't have the ball handlers and passers who can get shots on their own -- this may be real reason.
That’s it for me.
Oh wait, your ball handling point too
For whatever reason we are underutilizing both Kat and Mikal -- not enough easy shots for Kat and not enough initiation (or high screen) touches for Mikal. When Jalen is in everything kind of runs thru that lens and we hope he's great.
