gradyandrew wrote:Panos wrote:Funny, I remember being so excited to draft Lampe who was slotted #5 in some predraft predictions at #30, thinking he was going to be a steal.
He stole alright. Par for the course for that era. Hated Tim Thomas. Both times. Soft ass punk. He was the anti-Knick. 6'10" and couldn't grab a rebound.
He was the Anthony Randolf before Rokus J was Andy Rautins.
Yeah but TT had one of the all time great Knicks quotes when he called out Kenyon Martin for being a Fugazi tough guy. Even when Kenyon went on a tear for NYK at the tail end of 2012-13, and was a big part of that huge end of season win streak, I always thought of him as Fugazi, lol.
Yeah. Only out was TT that was Fugazy. Remember him taking boxing lessons in the summer. But he was a total pussy
KVH was soft? LOL. Kid avg'd 16 and 8 rebs. He was goofy looking. Isiah gave Marbles the keys and abused the privelige.
Dudes that avg 8 rebs are not "soft". TT avg 12 and 3.5 but looked way cool. "Fugazy" Cool!
There was a reason Marbles was "all Alone". He had issues everywhere until his pulp ran out and was exiled from NBA and loved in China.
Panos wrote:Nalod wrote:KVH was soft? LOL. Kid avg'd 16 and 8 rebs. He was goofy looking. Isiah gave Marbles the keys and abused the privelige.
Dudes that avg 8 rebs are not "soft". TT avg 12 and 3.5 but looked way cool. "Fugazy" Cool!
There was a reason Marbles was "all Alone". He had issues everywhere until his pulp ran out and was exiled from NBA and loved in China.
Who said KVH was soft?
Marbles. Are you Marbury?
Panos wrote:Funny, I remember being so excited to draft Lampe who was slotted #5 in some predraft predictions at #30, thinking he was going to be a steal.
He stole alright. Par for the course for that era. Hated Tim Thomas. Both times. Soft ass punk. He was the anti-Knick. 6'10" and couldn't grab a rebound.
He was the Anthony Randolf before Rokus J was Andy Rautins.
Early 2000’s the nba and media were absolutely beyond desperate to find the next Dirk. The next big Eurostar that would put asses in seats and eyes on the tv in the post-Michael era. Michael even came back 2 years and couldn’t get enough votes to start in the all star game because his fans in the 90’s were a bunch of goofy frontrunners.
That’s why Darko was drafted over Carmelo, Pavel Podkolzin was hyped up for a workout in which he played HORSE with his agent, and this piece of crap Lampe Knicks fans got sold was the unicorn.
All the knicks had to do was nothing. Let Ewing’s contract expire, draft Amare and keep Camby and/or tank the 2003 draft when it was obvious to everyone with eyes that it was going to be the greatest draft ever if you had a top 5 pick. FML
So if knicks get Amare, you think they still repeat history to and we get Melo or Lebron?
Or that out of your depth? You see any sci fi Movie you know if you change the past, things change?
Nalod wrote:So if knicks get Amare, you think they still repeat history to and we get Melo or Lebron?
Or that out of your depth? You see any sci fi Movie you know if you change the past, things change?
Can you try to make sense?
Or can you only be coherent writing a 67 paragraph essay about the greatness of Elfrid Payton
I was being sarcastic about it being out of your depth. I was wrong. It was.
Changing the past? Its the basic plot to the classic movie "Back to the future" staring Michael J. Fox.
"Sci-Fi" refers to "Science Fiction". Fiction is make believe.
The core of my post was if you change one thing it can have effects on another. I gather 99% of the readers here understand this. Congratulations, your the 1%!
