Knicks · No Mitch, No Huk — now what? (page 14)

PatCummings wrote:

martin wrote:Not bad

I agree with you re Lively and his contract. I listened to that Podcast and Matkovic seems interesting. Seems like a guy that we can trade for and, if he looks promising, sign to a long term, low cost contract. We need to find some low cost young players that can be effective

Dadiet + 2 seconds for Matkovic? We’d save nearly $1M in that deal and it probably allows us to add a 15th player to the roster like McCullar or Nickel. That frees up a 2 way slot which is a great way for us to find more young talent.

I like the idea of Matkovic but really only know his game via highlights, does seem like a good fit though.

I wonder if the trade floodgates now open with LeBron all wrapped up. So many teams with unfinished business left

If the Sixers waive Johni Broome that should be a no-brainer for the Knicks. Rebounding machine who dominated summer league. Also a CAA client fwiw. Very good 3rd center option.