I like it. DeRozan showed he could take on the playmaking role in the high post with San Antonio.. I think would super charge out second unit. The lack of a three pointer would be less of an issue if he's flanked by Landry, Deuce
martin wrote:BlueKnickers wrote:gradyandrew wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:Derozan is an interesting player. He’s highly inefficient. Isn’t great on defense. Like Clarkson, he is a high volume shooter that gets his stats in volume not efficiency. Clarkson surprised me by making his game a hustle game. One of effort. I’m curious if DD can do the same thing. You get a scorer for the second unit at the cost of efficiency. Hart is actually the better three point shooter :)
Josh was number 16 in the league last season on 3P%! Straight up sniper.
I feel like DeRozan has been a waste of a career. Seems like the kind of guy who could have been a playoff legend over the past 5 years as defenses locked up on 3 point shooters and kept a big tied to the rim to prevent layups. Instead he's been stuck on ass teams. Hopefully the money keeps him happy.
DD is a dinosaur type of player. The era he's in has passed him by. At his age there are going to be limited opportunities left for him. If you're a shooter looking to land somewhere on a vet minimum, most clubs will want a three point shot in your bag. At one time, he was a bucket and hard to stop in the mid-range, but he has the wrong specialty these days.
DD is the Mitch Robinson of 3 point shooters?
Rumor is they are the same person, AKA Dr. Demar & Mr. Mitch
