NBA · OT: KOBE!!!! (page 2)

I'm glad he's proving it because he was my favorite player before he started driving Shaq away.

Posted by Bonn1997:

Was it the right decision to leave him in to pile up more points once the outcome of the game wasn't in question? I don't really think that's good sportsmanship.

who cares. Somebody on the Raptors should've put him down if they were offended. That was the second greatest single game performance of all time.

Posted by Bonn1997:

Was it the right decision to leave him in to pile up more points once the outcome of the game wasn't in question? I don't really think that's good sportsmanship.

when Chamberlin scored 100...wasnt it a blowout too?

Posted by jaydh:

Posted by Bonn1997:

Was it the right decision to leave him in to pile up more points once the outcome of the game wasn't in question? I don't really think that's good sportsmanship.

give me a break..

why? It was an awesome performance. There's no need for me to state that. I guess I don't believe in stat padding.

Posted by Bonn1997:

Was it the right decision to leave him in to pile up more points once the outcome of the game wasn't in question? I don't really think that's good sportsmanship.

this may have been the worst post you have ever made.

There were newspaper reports at the time Kobe was drafted, that the Knicks could have traded for his rights, but refused to give up Oakley because they didn't want to take a step back to get better.

That's the kind of thinking that has led to a 33 year championship drought.

[Edited by - Rich on 01-23-2006 12:12 AM]

Posted by djsunyc:

Posted by Bonn1997:

Was it the right decision to leave him in to pile up more points once the outcome of the game wasn't in question? I don't really think that's good sportsmanship.

this may have been the worst post you have ever made.

I'll take that as an EXTREME compliment since it wasn't even Knick related and was a comment I thought about for way less than a minute.

who has the 3rd most? D-Rob with 71?

Idiots who said they would take Lebron over Kobe MAN UP!!!!

Posted by gunsnewing:

who has the 3rd most? D-Rob with 71?

Wilt's had a few in the 70s and some guy named David Thompson once had 73.

Posted by gunsnewing:

who has the 3rd most? D-Rob with 71?

David Thompson with 74.

Posted by BRIGGS:

if kobe wanted to, he can legitametly score 100+ in a game

perhaps, I'm not sold. as good as he is he has to be unconscious and lpay almost perfect to put up 100. He pretty much did that and got 82 tonight. 100 is still 18 points away, eiter way, thats shit is phenomenal.

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 01-23-2006 12:13 AM]

Posted by McK1:

Idiots who said they would take Lebron over Kobe MAN UP!!!!

Posted by Killa4luv:

Posted by BRIGGS:

if kobe wanted to, he can legitametly score 100+ in a game

perhaps, I'm not sold. as good as he is he has to be unconscious and lpay almost perfect to put up 100. He pretty much did that and got 82 tonight. 100 is still 18 points away, eiter way, thats shit is phenomenal.

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 01-23-2006 12:13 AM]

Agreed on all points.

Posted by Killa4luv:


Lakers still should have traded him to compete for another chip with Shaq and another superstar.

whaaaaaaaat theeeeeeeeeeee fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck


[Edited by - McK1 on 01-23-2006 12:14 AM]

Posted by McK1:

Posted by Killa4luv:


Lakers still should have traded him to compete for another chip with Shaq and another superstar.

whaaaaaaaat theeeeeeeeeeee fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck


[Edited by - McK1 on 01-23-2006 12:14 AM]

seriously, shaq is not that dominant anymore.

Posted by Bonn1997:

Posted by gunsnewing:

who has the 3rd most? D-Rob with 71?

Wilt's had a few in the 70s and some guy named David Thompson once had 73.

David Thompson of NC State he was good don't know what happened to him though. his career ended early I believe

Posted by McK1:

Idiots who said they would take Lebron over Kobe MAN UP!!!!

seriously lol

Kobe has always had that killer instinct never thought he'd be as good as Jordan but if he keeps playing like this and leads the Lakers to a championship wow

Posted by jaydh:

Posted by McK1:

Posted by Killa4luv:


Lakers still should have traded him to compete for another chip with Shaq and another superstar.

whaaaaaaaat theeeeeeeeeeee fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck


[Edited by - McK1 on 01-23-2006 12:14 AM]

seriously, shaq is not that dominant anymore.

YOu think they would have been a lottery team with Shaq last year? I'm sure they could have at least gotten Marbury, Pierce, someone at that level for Kobe. Would a Pierce/Shaq or Marbury/Shaq combo have missed the playoffs last year and be only around .500 this year? Maybe that combo would be less flashy than Kobe but Killa and I are talk about wins not flash.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 01-23-2006 12:17 AM]

Posted by Bonn1997:

Was it the right decision to leave him in to pile up more points once the outcome of the game wasn't in question? I don't really think that's good sportsmanship.

OMG, just STFU already. Seriously. If Bonn were Joe Torre, he would have pulled Wells and Cone after being perfect for 8 innings because the game and good sportsmanship were more important than individual achievements.

Posted by Bonn1997:

Posted by jaydh:

Posted by McK1:

Posted by Killa4luv:


Lakers still should have traded him to compete for another chip with Shaq and another superstar.

whaaaaaaaat theeeeeeeeeeee fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck


[Edited by - McK1 on 01-23-2006 12:14 AM]

seriously, shaq is not that dominant anymore.

YOu think they would have been a lottery team with Shaq last year? I'm sure they could have at least gotten Marbury, Pierce, someone at that level for Kobe. Would a Pierce/Shaq or Marbury/Shaq combo have missed the playoffs last year and be only around .500 this year? Maybe that combo would be less flashy than Kobe but Killa and I are talk about wins not flash.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 01-23-2006 12:17 AM]

i never said they would have been a lottery team. shaq and a good wing player is still a good team, but not a championship team. miami isnt going to win the ring with shaq.