Off Topic · Even Obama Admitted He Not Ready (page 1)
TheSage@ 9/5/2008 4:37 PM
Obama agreed with both Hillary and McCain
martin@ 9/5/2008 5:28 PM
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
bitty41@ 9/5/2008 5:42 PM
Posted by martin:
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
I concur LAME back in 2004 I thought I was going to runaway to Paris lol.
oohah@ 9/5/2008 6:50 PM
This is why all of the stuff like comparing the candidates policy etc. does not matter. People are going to vote for who they want to for their own reasons that have nothing to do with reality.
oohah
Bonn1997@ 9/5/2008 7:18 PM
Posted by martin:
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
I also heard that in 1959 Joe Biden said he wasn't ready to be VP!
TheSage@ 9/5/2008 10:17 PM
That was when he was running for the Senate and effectively said that two years in the Senate didn't qualify him. And Bonn if you did that was probaly correct-few high school students are qualified to be VP but this was a 43 year old man running for his first statewide office.
martin@ 9/6/2008 1:09 PM
Posted by TheSage:
That was when he was running for the Senate and effectively said that two years in the Senate didn't qualify him. And Bonn if you did that was probaly correct-few high school students are qualified to be VP but this was a 43 year old man running for his first statewide office.
if he said that 2 years in the Senate didn't qualify him.... isn't it 4 years later now?
Bonn1997@ 9/6/2008 1:20 PM
Posted by TheSage:
That was when he was running for the Senate and effectively said that two years in the Senate didn't qualify him. And Bonn if you did that was probaly correct-few high school students are qualified to be VP but this was a 43 year old man running for his first statewide office.
Fair enough. Senator McCain said the same thing about himself when he graduated high school in 1859!
izybx@ 9/8/2008 2:53 PM
Posted by martin:
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
I think that posting comments made by someone running for office in 2008 about how he doesnt have the experience to run for office in 2008 isnt lame at all. Then again, theres nothing like 2 years in the senate to qualify you to be president of the united states. I guess when he made those comments in 2004 he didnt realize that in 2006 he would have been in the Senate two years. Or maybe he was being truthful and honest and admitted that by 2008 he wouldnt have even come close to having the experience necessary to be POTUS.
martin@ 9/8/2008 3:22 PM
Posted by izybx:
Posted by martin:
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
I think that posting comments made by someone running for office in 2008 about how he doesnt have the experience to run for office in 2008 isnt lame at all. Then again, theres nothing like 2 years in the senate to qualify you to be president of the united states. I guess when he made those comments in 2004 he didnt realize that in 2006 he would have been in the Senate two years. Or maybe he was being truthful and honest and admitted that by 2008 he wouldnt have even come close to having the experience necessary to be POTUS.
apparently you missed the entire point of my post.
izybx@ 9/8/2008 4:06 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by izybx:
Posted by martin:
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
I think that posting comments made by someone running for office in 2008 about how he doesnt have the experience to run for office in 2008 isnt lame at all. Then again, theres nothing like 2 years in the senate to qualify you to be president of the united states. I guess when he made those comments in 2004 he didnt realize that in 2006 he would have been in the Senate two years. Or maybe he was being truthful and honest and admitted that by 2008 he wouldnt have even come close to having the experience necessary to be POTUS.
apparently you missed the entire point of my post.
Apparently
ramtour420@ 9/8/2008 9:03 PM
Posted by izybx:
Posted by martin:
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
I think that posting comments made by someone running for office in 2008 about how he doesnt have the experience to run for office in 2008 isnt lame at all. Then again, theres nothing like 2 years in the senate to qualify you to be president of the united states. I guess when he made those comments in 2004 he didnt realize that in 2006 he would have been in the Senate two years. Or maybe he was being truthful and honest and admitted that by 2008 he wouldnt have even come close to having the experience necessary to be POTUS.
Honestly who cares how he felt 4 year ago ? Besides its not like McCain is even an option, honestly, i mean voting for McCain over this dude- thats like saying we'll send a retarded person to space because the shuttle pilot said 4 years ago that he wasn't gonna be ready to fly for a while.
izybx@ 9/10/2008 12:45 AM
Posted by ramtour420:
Posted by izybx:
Posted by martin:
I dunno dude, if you are going to post something like this you also may want to put into thread title, etc that he said it back in 2004. And that he was asked if he would run on the National ticket in 2008.
Lame.
I think that posting comments made by someone running for office in 2008 about how he doesnt have the experience to run for office in 2008 isnt lame at all. Then again, theres nothing like 2 years in the senate to qualify you to be president of the united states. I guess when he made those comments in 2004 he didnt realize that in 2006 he would have been in the Senate two years. Or maybe he was being truthful and honest and admitted that by 2008 he wouldnt have even come close to having the experience necessary to be POTUS.
Honestly who cares how he felt 4 year ago ? Besides its not like McCain is even an option, honestly, i mean voting for McCain over this dude- thats like saying we'll send a retarded person to space because the shuttle pilot said 4 years ago that he wasn't gonna be ready to fly for a while.
I dont really get the point of your analogy. People who arent liberals will vote for Mccain. He is their option. But then again for someone who views soldiers as murderers I guess there is only one option.
TheGame@ 9/10/2008 4:57 PM
Obama will have alot to learn, but unlike McCain, who finished 894 out of 899 in his class, and Palin, who has no clue about the national economy and foreign policy, Obama is well-educated and has shown that he is a thoughtful and articulate forward-thinker. I trust his ability to figure it out more than I do McCain's so-called experience.
izybx@ 9/11/2008 2:35 PM
Posted by TheGame:
Obama will have alot to learn, but unlike McCain, who finished 894 out of 899 in his class, and Palin, who has no clue about the national economy and foreign policy, Obama is well-educated and has shown that he is a thoughtful and articulate forward-thinker. I trust his ability to figure it out more than I do McCain's so-called experience.
Obamas Ivy league education and the fact that he can give a good speech are his primary qualifications to be president. Let me ask you, how can you trust his ability to figure anything out. This is a guy who has 143 days of senate experience (days the senate was actually up and running) before he decided to run for president. This a guy who says himself that he is qualified to be president because he has the experience of running a presidential campaign lol. While he may very well have "the ability to figure it out" its impossible to know because he has never been tested, he has never accomplished anything during his short tenure as a senator or as community organizer, and he has no other experience to speak of!
If you say that Palin is also inexperienced and unqualified, I agree 100%. We all know why she was chosen. But if you say she has no clue about foreign policy and the national economy, then why are you supporting a man who is equally clueless? Why would you vote for a man who is going to raise taxes when we have a 6.1% unemployment rate? Any economics 101 student knows that a fundamental rule of economics is higher taxes= higher unemployment. Why is this man going to increase government spending when we have a 400 billion dollar defecit? This is a guy whos foreign policy experience is making a speech in Germany during a rock concert. If the vice president of the GOP is a shameless publicity stunt, then Obama is worse!
bitty41@ 9/11/2008 3:23 PM
For anyone that believes that the average American voter is logical enough to properly investigate candidates positions and actions just read the above post.
izybx@ 9/11/2008 3:39 PM
Posted by bitty41:
For anyone that believes that the average American voter is logical enough to properly investigate candidates positions and actions just read the above post.
Of course, anybody who disagrees with the enlightened, educated Obama supported is simply misinformed and illogical. Im sorry I forgot. Because of course if anybody did any research they would realize that Obama has been sent to save us all.
Bonn1997@ 9/11/2008 4:26 PM
Posted by izybx:
Posted by TheGame:
Obama will have alot to learn, but unlike McCain, who finished 894 out of 899 in his class, and Palin, who has no clue about the national economy and foreign policy, Obama is well-educated and has shown that he is a thoughtful and articulate forward-thinker. I trust his ability to figure it out more than I do McCain's so-called experience.
Obamas Ivy league education and the fact that he can give a good speech are his primary qualifications to be president. Let me ask you, how can you trust his ability to figure anything out. This is a guy who has 143 days of senate experience (days the senate was actually up and running) before he decided to run for president. This a guy who says himself that he is qualified to be president because he has the experience of running a presidential campaign lol. While he may very well have "the ability to figure it out" its impossible to know because he has never been tested, he has never accomplished anything during his short tenure as a senator or as community organizer, and he has no other experience to speak of!
If you say that Palin is also inexperienced and unqualified, I agree 100%. We all know why she was chosen. But if you say she has no clue about foreign policy and the national economy, then why are you supporting a man who is equally clueless? Why would you vote for a man who is going to raise taxes when we have a 6.1% unemployment rate? Any economics 101 student knows that a fundamental rule of economics is higher taxes= higher unemployment. Why is this man going to increase government spending when we have a 400 billion dollar defecit? This is a guy whos foreign policy experience is making a speech in Germany during a rock concert. If the vice president of the GOP is a shameless publicity stunt, then Obama is worse!
Actually whether it's the topic of spending another 100 years in Iraq or giving tax breaks to those who don't need them, Obama has more *experience being right* than McCain and Palin have combined
nykshaknbake@ 9/11/2008 4:27 PM
What's ironic is that this party of logical (as opposed to emotional) decision makers and enligtened ones has a staple tatic of name calling and race baiting.
Posted by izybx:
Posted by bitty41:
For anyone that believes that the average American voter is logical enough to properly investigate candidates positions and actions just read the above post.
Of course, anybody who disagrees with the enlightened, educated Obama supported is simply misinformed and illogical. Im sorry I forgot. Because of course if anybody did any research they would realize that Obama has been sent to save us all.
bitty41@ 9/11/2008 5:45 PM
Posted by izybx:
Posted by bitty41:
For anyone that believes that the average American voter is logical enough to properly investigate candidates positions and actions just read the above post.
Of course, anybody who disagrees with the enlightened, educated Obama supported is simply misinformed and illogical. Im sorry I forgot. Because of course if anybody did any research they would realize that Obama has been sent to save us all.
In intial post you added 2+2 and got 7. You routinely ignore that Obama is a United States Senator which is a pretty prominent position in the American government. You also stated a blatant falsehood I will say this again Obama's economic plan would only raise taxes on the higher income bracket i.e. NOT YOU OR ME but the people making close to or more then 7 figures. And you also blame the high unemployment rate on high taxes because after all that's basic Economics 101 huh the only thing I will say about our high unemployment rate is that it's slightly more complex then high taxes? The funniest part is that all these messed up situations that exist right now horrible economy, out of control spending, and f*cked foreign policy is courtesy of you guessed it a Republican President.
bitty41@ 9/11/2008 5:49 PM
Posted by nykshaknbake:
What's ironic is that this party of logical (as opposed to emotional) decision makers and enligtened ones has a staple tatic of name calling and race baiting.
Posted by izybx:
Posted by bitty41:
For anyone that believes that the average American voter is logical enough to properly investigate candidates positions and actions just read the above post.
Of course, anybody who disagrees with the enlightened, educated Obama supported is simply misinformed and illogical. Im sorry I forgot. Because of course if anybody did any research they would realize that Obama has been sent to save us all.
It's hard when all you guys ever offer is subjective statements (Obama isn't experienced or qualified enough) I'm still waiting for a clear definition on that front of what constitutes "qualified and experienced" for a Presidential candidate?