Knicks · Fact: This team is garbage! (page 7)

tkf @ 1/18/2012 10:08 PM
FACT: we are not even good enough to be called garbage!!
colombian0725 @ 1/18/2012 10:16 PM
MS @ 1/20/2012 11:16 PM
Is this post still a reach or are we giving this team time to gel?
colombian0725 @ 1/20/2012 11:24 PM
MS wrote:Is this post still a reach or are we giving this team time to gel?

No they suck and when baron comes we will wait for them to gel all the way until the season is over and when miss the playoffs and everyone will say they needed time to gel and it was a short season. Point is even with Baron we will still be a sub par team. We can't even beat lottery teams. But of course everyone's excuse will be that Baron needs time to gel with the team and it was a short season.

gunsnewing @ 1/20/2012 11:56 PM
Judging from the Baron interview MSG aired doesn't look like he is going to be ready anytime soon
ramtour420 @ 1/21/2012 12:05 AM
tkf wrote:FACT: we are not even good enough to be called garbage!!

That is so true. We , right now cannot get any grade , other than incomplete. Our team needs better coaching than Miami, true. Can we make any definitive assumptions without BD when it comes to our future? No

Childs2Dudley @ 1/21/2012 12:10 AM
ramtour420 wrote:
tkf wrote:FACT: we are not even good enough to be called garbage!!

That is so true. We , right now cannot get any grade , other than incomplete. Our team needs better coaching than Miami, true. Can we make any definitive assumptions without BD when it comes to our future? No

I am getting sick and tired of this Baron Davis talk.

I think people really have made him out to be a larger than life figure rather than a 32 year old injury-riddled point guard.

I mean, seriously. If this team is hedging its' hopes on Baron Davis then it isn't good enough to compete for the playoffs, let alone the championship.

CrushAlot @ 1/21/2012 12:21 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
ramtour420 wrote:
tkf wrote:FACT: we are not even good enough to be called garbage!!

That is so true. We , right now cannot get any grade , other than incomplete. Our team needs better coaching than Miami, true. Can we make any definitive assumptions without BD when it comes to our future? No

I am getting sick and tired of this Baron Davis talk.

I think people really have made him out to be a larger than life figure rather than a 32 year old injury-riddled point guard.

I mean, seriously. If this team is hedging its' hopes on Baron Davis then it isn't good enough to compete for the playoffs, let alone the championship.

Davis fell into the Knicks lap. There is no way that they could have planned that their savior would be amnestied, not claimed and then would sign with them. If he plays like he did when he was healthy the Knicks stole a star but counting on that to turn around the franchise doesn't seem that realistic. I am psyched the Knicks signed Davis but last year he had a cyst on his knee, back problems and he isn't always in shape. Like everyone that roots for the Knicks I want this to work but there are a lot of reasons to be concerned if he is supposed to be the savior.
Bonn1997 @ 1/21/2012 1:31 AM
colombian0725 wrote:
MS wrote:Is this post still a reach or are we giving this team time to gel?

No they suck and when baron comes we will wait for them to gel all the way until the season is over and when miss the playoffs and everyone will say they needed time to gel and it was a short season. Point is even with Baron we will still be a sub par team. We can't even beat lottery teams. But of course everyone's excuse will be that Baron needs time to gel with the team and it was a short season.


After the 3rd game, I said that without Davis they looked like they would be a .450 team and many here thought I was just hating.
mmorman @ 1/21/2012 7:08 AM
The first game of the year against the Celtics -- that was their best. It's been all down hill from there!
markvmc @ 1/21/2012 11:16 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
colombian0725 wrote:
MS wrote:Is this post still a reach or are we giving this team time to gel?

No they suck and when baron comes we will wait for them to gel all the way until the season is over and when miss the playoffs and everyone will say they needed time to gel and it was a short season. Point is even with Baron we will still be a sub par team. We can't even beat lottery teams. But of course everyone's excuse will be that Baron needs time to gel with the team and it was a short season.


After the 3rd game, I said that without Davis they looked like they would be a .450 team and many here thought I was just hating.

Not me. I thought you were a wild eyed optimist.

CashMoney @ 1/21/2012 12:34 PM
mmorman wrote:The first game of the year against the Celtics -- that was their best. It's been all down hill from there!

They looked damn good against Detroit.

gunsnewing @ 1/21/2012 12:39 PM
CashMoney wrote:
mmorman wrote:The first game of the year against the Celtics -- that was their best. It's been all down hill from there!

They looked damn good against Detroit.

The was the only game this year where they played for almost 48mins and Bibby went off from 3 in that game otherwise it would've probably been another struggle

CashMoney @ 1/21/2012 12:46 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
mmorman wrote:The first game of the year against the Celtics -- that was their best. It's been all down hill from there!

They looked damn good against Detroit.

The was the only game this year where they played for almost 48mins and Bibby went off from 3 in that game otherwise it would've probably been another struggle

It shows me their capable of playing that way, they just need to get their crap together.

markvmc @ 1/21/2012 12:48 PM
Every team in the league can play a good game from time to time. Doesn't mean there's necessarily anything to get together.
AnubisADL @ 1/21/2012 12:50 PM
Fact

- We have the 2nd best SF in the East
- We have the 2nd best PF in the East at WORSE
- We have a defensive anchor at C which is hard to come by
- We have young players we can move for pieces that fit
- All our large contracts are moveable

martin @ 1/21/2012 1:19 PM
AnubisADL wrote:Fact

- We have the 2nd best SF in the East
- We have the 2nd best PF in the East at WORSE
- We have a defensive anchor at C which is hard to come by
- We have young players we can move for pieces that fit
- All our large contracts are moveable

bullcrap. These are your opinions and they are off the mark. At best.

AnubisADL @ 1/21/2012 1:21 PM
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Fact

- We have the 2nd best SF in the East
- We have the 2nd best PF in the East at WORSE
- We have a defensive anchor at C which is hard to come by
- We have young players we can move for pieces that fit
- All our large contracts are moveable

bullcrap. These are your opinions and they are off the mark. At best.

Of course they are my opinions. It was a play on the thread title.

Lighten up Martin.

martin @ 1/21/2012 1:28 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Fact

- We have the 2nd best SF in the East
- We have the 2nd best PF in the East at WORSE
- We have a defensive anchor at C which is hard to come by
- We have young players we can move for pieces that fit
- All our large contracts are moveable

bullcrap. These are your opinions and they are off the mark. At best.

Of course they are my opinions. It was a play on the thread title.

Lighten up Martin.

yeah. This forum is starting to get bogged down in fanboy-like posting that really don't add much in the overall picture. Time to turn that around some.

AnubisADL @ 1/21/2012 1:41 PM
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Fact

- We have the 2nd best SF in the East
- We have the 2nd best PF in the East at WORSE
- We have a defensive anchor at C which is hard to come by
- We have young players we can move for pieces that fit
- All our large contracts are moveable

bullcrap. These are your opinions and they are off the mark. At best.

Of course they are my opinions. It was a play on the thread title.

Lighten up Martin.

yeah. This forum is starting to get bogged down in fanboy-like posting that really don't add much in the overall picture. Time to turn that around some.

I just think expectations are really high for this team. Once we start winning things will settle down.

I personally dont care much about the regular season. I just want our team to get into the playoffs healthy. If we can do that we are contenders.

MSG3 @ 1/21/2012 2:20 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Fact

- We have the 2nd best SF in the East
- We have the 2nd best PF in the East at WORSE
- We have a defensive anchor at C which is hard to come by
- We have young players we can move for pieces that fit
- All our large contracts are moveable

bullcrap. These are your opinions and they are off the mark. At best.

Of course they are my opinions. It was a play on the thread title.

Lighten up Martin.

yeah. This forum is starting to get bogged down in fanboy-like posting that really don't add much in the overall picture. Time to turn that around some.

I just think expectations are really high for this team. Once we start winning things will settle down.

I personally dont care much about the regular season. I just want our team to get into the playoffs healthy. If we can do that we are contenders.

We are not even close to contenders if Davis doesn't pan out and our players dont start hitting jumpers. The sample size isn't that small anymore.

Page 7 of 11