ToddTT wrote:blkexec wrote:fishmike wrote:total Knick homerism, and thats fine. Unless folks think Dwight is broken and his body wont be the same (like post-Pho Amare) then its Dwight and its not debatable. You cant build a team around Chandler. Dwight you put average NBA talent and your winning 50 games a year and going to the 2nd round every year.Cmon folks. Dwight may be a tool but he comes back healthy he's the best big in the NBA since Shaq
If Dwight is that good, why did the Lakers suck? Thats the best talent Dwight will ever play with in his entire career. If he's that good, the Lakers wouldn't be such a laughing stock. And this was before Kobe's injury. Dwight clearly showed how overrated he is.
+1
And post-herniation Dwight is a ticking time bomb. What will do him in first, the back or the shoulder?
Well, it's not as if Tyson doesn't have injury concerns of his own. He's been dealing with a bulging disc in his neck for awhile now and hasn't looked good at all for weeks.
I picked a healthy Amere!
Can't believe it's a question. Chandler is an above average defensive player and a below average defensive player. Howard is the most dominant center in the league..on a an off year.
M D A
blkexec wrote:fishmike wrote:total Knick homerism, and thats fine. Unless folks think Dwight is broken and his body wont be the same (like post-Pho Amare) then its Dwight and its not debatable. You cant build a team around Chandler. Dwight you put average NBA talent and your winning 50 games a year and going to the 2nd round every year.Cmon folks. Dwight may be a tool but he comes back healthy he's the best big in the NBA since Shaq
If Dwight is that good, why did the Lakers suck? Thats the best talent Dwight will ever play with in his entire career. If he's that good, the Lakers wouldn't be such a laughing stock. And this was before Kobe's injury. Dwight clearly showed how overrated he is.
nykshaknbake wrote:M D A
blkexec wrote:fishmike wrote:total Knick homerism, and thats fine. Unless folks think Dwight is broken and his body wont be the same (like post-Pho Amare) then its Dwight and its not debatable. You cant build a team around Chandler. Dwight you put average NBA talent and your winning 50 games a year and going to the 2nd round every year.Cmon folks. Dwight may be a tool but he comes back healthy he's the best big in the NBA since Shaq
If Dwight is that good, why did the Lakers suck? Thats the best talent Dwight will ever play with in his entire career. If he's that good, the Lakers wouldn't be such a laughing stock. And this was before Kobe's injury. Dwight clearly showed how overrated he is.
I probably dislike MDA more than you. But if we are crowning Dwight Howard the king of all centers. The best big man to play in the NBA in this era, then I don't care if the Lakers were coached by bugs bunny.
Put any great NBA player / center on that team and you would have a different outcome.
What everybody doesn't understand about players like Chandler, is that he understands his limitations, understands his role, and plays his role to the best. By the way, he has leadership qualities that makes other players follow. Dwight is not there yet. So I can't crown him with anything, other than potential. Of course he's a physical beast, but thats only part of the equation that makes a player great. I'm still waiting for the other part(s)....
blkexec wrote:nykshaknbake wrote:M D A
blkexec wrote:fishmike wrote:total Knick homerism, and thats fine. Unless folks think Dwight is broken and his body wont be the same (like post-Pho Amare) then its Dwight and its not debatable. You cant build a team around Chandler. Dwight you put average NBA talent and your winning 50 games a year and going to the 2nd round every year.Cmon folks. Dwight may be a tool but he comes back healthy he's the best big in the NBA since Shaq
If Dwight is that good, why did the Lakers suck? Thats the best talent Dwight will ever play with in his entire career. If he's that good, the Lakers wouldn't be such a laughing stock. And this was before Kobe's injury. Dwight clearly showed how overrated he is.
I probably dislike MDA more than you. But if we are crowning Dwight Howard the king of all centers. The best big man to play in the NBA in this era, then I don't care if the Lakers were coached by bugs bunny.
Put any great NBA player / center on that team and you would have a different outcome.
What everybody doesn't understand about players like Chandler, is that he understands his limitations, understands his role, and plays his role to the best. By the way, he has leadership qualities that makes other players follow. Dwight is not there yet. So I can't crown him with anything, other than potential. Of course he's a physical beast, but thats only part of the equation that makes a player great. I'm still waiting for the other part(s)....
I agree but he isn't the same beast he was. Once you have shoulder issues it changes what exercises you can do and alters your workout. JVG was talking about Patrick when he had achilles issues before it finally ruptured. He said Patrick couldn't do the conditioning work like he did before and gained weight which compounded his achilles issues. Dwight is younger and maybe surgery corrects things for him and he can continue to be a workout warrior but he definitely is a risk for declining. Similar to Amare, his game is based on dominant strength and athleticism. He doesn't appear to be the most cerebral guy and recently he has brought a lot of drama to the teams he has played on.
this is a no brainer - Chandler. The Heat won a championship without a true center. Chandler can guard every position on the floor. At his best he is a great defender of every position on the court. Plus, Howard is a little whiny spoiled child
howard because he is a top player, chandler is nice and all but howard is on a different level, he can dominate a game like shaq daddy
Bonn1997 wrote:MS wrote:Chandler is one of the most overrated players in the entire league. He doesn't score or block shots. His defense somehow become urban legend after Miami couldn't figure out how to beat a zone.Howard was 18pts 12rbs and had a terrible season, which would be Chandlers career year. There are 10 centers better than Chandler and none better than dwight.
Look at Chandler's playoff averages that ends the debate.
Howard took almost twice as many shots and 3 times as many FTs. The difference should have been much more than 6 PPG.
Lol, what about how many games lost due to hack-a-Dwight?
nyk4ever wrote:howards a baby and a sideshow - i wouldn't want to deal with that whole mess.
he'd wilt under the New York Media attention Hell, he couldn't properly deal with the SMALL MARKET media attention in Orlando. Also, no matter how good he is, unless he averaged 20pt, 20 rbs and 5blks a game, he's suck. Knicks fans are NEVER happy with their current players and always over value guys playing elsewhere.
DurzoBlint wrote:nyk4ever wrote:howards a baby and a sideshow - i wouldn't want to deal with that whole mess.
he'd wilt under the New York Media attention Hell, he couldn't properly deal with the SMALL MARKET media attention in Orlando. Also, no matter how good he is, unless he averaged 20pt, 20 rbs and 5blks a game, he's suck. Knicks fans are NEVER happy with their current players and always over value guys playing elsewhere.
Did you not look at the poll results in this very thread?
blkexec wrote:fishmike wrote:total Knick homerism, and thats fine. Unless folks think Dwight is broken and his body wont be the same (like post-Pho Amare) then its Dwight and its not debatable. You cant build a team around Chandler. Dwight you put average NBA talent and your winning 50 games a year and going to the 2nd round every year.Cmon folks. Dwight may be a tool but he comes back healthy he's the best big in the NBA since Shaq
If Dwight is that good, why did the Lakers suck? Thats the best talent Dwight will ever play with in his entire career. If he's that good, the Lakers wouldn't be such a laughing stock. And this was before Kobe's injury. Dwight clearly showed how overrated he is.
Was Dwight healthy all year? Was Nash? Gasol? Please.. you obviously didnt follow that team much
Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:nyk4ever wrote:howards a baby and a sideshow - i wouldn't want to deal with that whole mess.
he'd wilt under the New York Media attention Hell, he couldn't properly deal with the SMALL MARKET media attention in Orlando. Also, no matter how good he is, unless he averaged 20pt, 20 rbs and 5blks a game, he's suck. Knicks fans are NEVER happy with their current players and always over value guys playing elsewhere.
Did you not look at the poll results in this very thread?
huh?
DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:nyk4ever wrote:howards a baby and a sideshow - i wouldn't want to deal with that whole mess.
he'd wilt under the New York Media attention Hell, he couldn't properly deal with the SMALL MARKET media attention in Orlando. Also, no matter how good he is, unless he averaged 20pt, 20 rbs and 5blks a game, he's suck. Knicks fans are NEVER happy with their current players and always over value guys playing elsewhere.
Did you not look at the poll results in this very thread?
huh?
You said we over value players playing elsewhere but people are picking Chandler over Dwight.
Bonn1997 wrote:MS wrote:Chandler is one of the most overrated players in the entire league. He doesn't score or block shots. His defense somehow become urban legend after Miami couldn't figure out how to beat a zone.Howard was 18pts 12rbs and had a terrible season, which would be Chandlers career year. There are 10 centers better than Chandler and none better than dwight.
Look at Chandler's playoff averages that ends the debate.
Howard took almost twice as many shots and 3 times as many FTs. The difference should have been much more than 6 PPG.
It's easy to score efficiently when all your shots are spoonfed to you on a silver platter by JKidd and Felton, two of the best alley-oopers in the game. If there is not a perfect storm Tyson struggles to score, he is a terrible offensive player. I repeat he is a T-E-R-R-I-B-L-E offensive player. He can't even make a lay-up...K-mart is michael Jordan on offense compared to Chandler and Kmart has a very basic offensive skillset. People talk about tyson's hands- they're some of the worst in the league, especially when he's flu Tyson. As stated above, Noah is a better pick than both Chandler and Howard.
Dagger wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:MS wrote:Chandler is one of the most overrated players in the entire league. He doesn't score or block shots. His defense somehow become urban legend after Miami couldn't figure out how to beat a zone.Howard was 18pts 12rbs and had a terrible season, which would be Chandlers career year. There are 10 centers better than Chandler and none better than dwight.
Look at Chandler's playoff averages that ends the debate.
Howard took almost twice as many shots and 3 times as many FTs. The difference should have been much more than 6 PPG.
It's easy to score efficiently when all your shots are spoonfed to you on a silver platter by JKidd and Felton, two of the best alley-oopers in the game. If there is not a perfect storm Tyson struggles to score, he is a terrible offensive player. I repeat he is a T-E-R-R-I-B-L-E offensive player. He can't even make a lay-up...K-mart is michael Jordan on offense compared to Chandler and Kmart has a very basic offensive skillset. People talk about tyson's hands- they're some of the worst in the league, especially when he's flu Tyson. As stated above, Noah is a better pick than both Chandler and Howard.
When Hakeem called you hard headed, you must have issues.
DurzoBlint wrote:Dagger wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:MS wrote:Chandler is one of the most overrated players in the entire league. He doesn't score or block shots. His defense somehow become urban legend after Miami couldn't figure out how to beat a zone.Howard was 18pts 12rbs and had a terrible season, which would be Chandlers career year. There are 10 centers better than Chandler and none better than dwight.
Look at Chandler's playoff averages that ends the debate.
Howard took almost twice as many shots and 3 times as many FTs. The difference should have been much more than 6 PPG.
It's easy to score efficiently when all your shots are spoonfed to you on a silver platter by JKidd and Felton, two of the best alley-oopers in the game. If there is not a perfect storm Tyson struggles to score, he is a terrible offensive player. I repeat he is a T-E-R-R-I-B-L-E offensive player. He can't even make a lay-up...K-mart is michael Jordan on offense compared to Chandler and Kmart has a very basic offensive skillset. People talk about tyson's hands- they're some of the worst in the league, especially when he's flu Tyson. As stated above, Noah is a better pick than both Chandler and Howard.
When Hakeem called you hard headed, you must have issues.
Um, what? Who is Hakeem and what are you talking about?
Besides free throw % Dwight was better in just about every category. He was at the top of the league in most categories. Tyson was right up there with Dwight on technicals. He's slacked off a bit this year in some games but geez so has Tyson. Dwight's a better shot blocker and its not even close offensively. All Tyson really has is the alley oop and that's not a go-to play. Tyson is a better locker room prescense but he's not a coach on the floor by any means. Besides the drama that DH brings, this isn't much of a debate.
He led his team to the finals, whereas Chandler was 2nd or 3rd bananna on his championship team. He an enormous crybaby, but he's been a defensive beast throughout his career and he commands a triple team in the post.
blkexec wrote:nykshaknbake wrote:M D A
blkexec wrote:fishmike wrote:total Knick homerism, and thats fine. Unless folks think Dwight is broken and his body wont be the same (like post-Pho Amare) then its Dwight and its not debatable. You cant build a team around Chandler. Dwight you put average NBA talent and your winning 50 games a year and going to the 2nd round every year.Cmon folks. Dwight may be a tool but he comes back healthy he's the best big in the NBA since Shaq
If Dwight is that good, why did the Lakers suck? Thats the best talent Dwight will ever play with in his entire career. If he's that good, the Lakers wouldn't be such a laughing stock. And this was before Kobe's injury. Dwight clearly showed how overrated he is.
I probably dislike MDA more than you. But if we are crowning Dwight Howard the king of all centers. The best big man to play in the NBA in this era, then I don't care if the Lakers were coached by bugs bunny.
Put any great NBA player / center on that team and you would have a different outcome.
What everybody doesn't understand about players like Chandler, is that he understands his limitations, understands his role, and plays his role to the best. By the way, he has leadership qualities that makes other players follow. Dwight is not there yet. So I can't crown him with anything, other than potential. Of course he's a physical beast, but thats only part of the equation that makes a player great. I'm still waiting for the other part(s)....
When Chandler switches onto a guard its always a layup. Not a knock on him as what center can keep up, but the statement isn't true.
SupremeCommander wrote:this is a no brainer - Chandler. The Heat won a championship without a true center. Chandler can guard every position on the floor. At his best he is a great defender of every position on the court. Plus, Howard is a little whiny spoiled child