Knicks · What's the point? (page 1)

misterearl @ 11/26/2013 10:46 AM
The Knicks backcourt, focusing at lead guard, is overmatched. There may not be a single NBA team that either Raymond Felton, Beno Udrih or Pablo Prigioni can impose their presence offensively or defensively.

This seems to be a theme we hit on nightly, but once again the Knicks had a tough time stopping the opposing point guard. Damian Lillard had 23 points and six assists. He routinely got by Beno Udrih, the Knicks' starter. New York entered play Monday night allowing point guards to score an average of 21 points per game. Not good. You can bet that Chris Paul is looking forward to Wednesday night. - ESPN

Without quality leadership (and defensive stickiness) at guard, the entire tempo of the game on both ends is dictated by the opponent.

Carmelo bringing the ball up court is a desperation move. It is a last resort. Fantasy trades and hopes for Toure Murry being an answer are a reach. What else is there?

The Curse of Chris Smith lives.

BRIGGS @ 11/26/2013 10:50 AM
misterearl wrote:The Knicks backcourt, focusing at lead guard, is overmatched. There may not be a single NBA team that either Raymond Felton, Beno Udrih or Pablo Prigioni can impose their presence offensively or defensively.

This seems to be a theme we hit on nightly, but once again the Knicks had a tough time stopping the opposing point guard. Damian Lillard had 23 points and six assists. He routinely got by Beno Udrih, the Knicks' starter. New York entered play Monday night allowing point guards to score an average of 21 points per game. Not good. You can bet that Chris Paul is looking forward to Wednesday night. - ESPN

Without quality leadership (and defensive stickiness) at guard, the entire tempo of the game on both ends is dictated by the opponent.

Carmelo bringing the ball up court is a desperation move. It is a last resort. Fantasy trades and hopes for Toure Murry being an answer are a reach. What else is there?

The Curse of Chris Smith lives.

Thats what Im looking for in the draft 1 good PG who falls and a 7+ C. I have to assume we will wield our 3mm in cash for picks with only 7 roster spot taken next yea rand cap ped out.

Vmart @ 11/26/2013 10:51 AM
Don't forget the over matched coach who has lost the team.
franco12 @ 11/26/2013 10:52 AM
wondering this about your post!

Seriously, though, can we get Toney Douglas?

Even with Felton, I feel like we're over-matched there, and if we could get a role playing defensive minded fleet of foot PG we'd be better off.

Knixkik @ 11/26/2013 10:53 AM
I'm hoping we can send Shumpert for any upgrade at PG. It is a huge hole on this team. We have 3 backup PGs and no starters. That is where we hurt the most. Not one of our PGs would start for any other team in the league.
GustavBahler @ 11/26/2013 10:53 AM
Was saying that in the game thread, we need an upgrade, should be a top priority. All our PGs are capable backups, but they aren't starter material.
gunsnewing @ 11/26/2013 10:54 AM
We don't need a PG if the game plan is to dump the ball to Melo and JR and move out the way
Vmart @ 11/26/2013 10:56 AM
Knixkik wrote:I'm hoping we can send Shumpert for any upgrade at PG. It is a huge hole on this team. We have 3 backup PGs and no starters. That is where we hurt the most. Not one of our PGs would start for any other team in the league.

Defensively these PGs we have are very weak. On offense they are very good at executing Woody's offense though.

franco12 @ 11/26/2013 10:56 AM
gunsnewing wrote:We don't need a PG if the game plan is to dump the ball to Melo and JR and move out the way

even if that is the game plan, I think we need an upgrade as far as the defense is concerned. Get me someone who can at least slow down opposing PGs.

GustavBahler @ 11/26/2013 10:57 AM
gunsnewing wrote:We don't need a PG if the game plan is to dump the ball to Melo and JR and move out the way

Bargs has been chipping in as well, Melo hasn't stopped him from contributing. The better the PG the better the looks everyone will get. I agree that JR needs to be reigned in though. No more carte blanche, that ship has sailed.

djsunyc @ 11/26/2013 11:02 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
misterearl wrote:The Knicks backcourt, focusing at lead guard, is overmatched. There may not be a single NBA team that either Raymond Felton, Beno Udrih or Pablo Prigioni can impose their presence offensively or defensively.

This seems to be a theme we hit on nightly, but once again the Knicks had a tough time stopping the opposing point guard. Damian Lillard had 23 points and six assists. He routinely got by Beno Udrih, the Knicks' starter. New York entered play Monday night allowing point guards to score an average of 21 points per game. Not good. You can bet that Chris Paul is looking forward to Wednesday night. - ESPN

Without quality leadership (and defensive stickiness) at guard, the entire tempo of the game on both ends is dictated by the opponent.

Carmelo bringing the ball up court is a desperation move. It is a last resort. Fantasy trades and hopes for Toure Murry being an answer are a reach. What else is there?

The Curse of Chris Smith lives.

Thats what Im looking for in the draft 1 good PG who falls and a 7+ C. I have to assume we will wield our 3mm in cash for picks with only 7 roster spot taken next yea rand cap ped out.

teams are allotted 3 mil cash to spend in transactions for the entire year. that means buying a pick for 3mil means they can no longer throw cash into any deal to make the $$$'s work.

secondly, how many picks have been sold recently? doesn't look like it's a common practice anymore. cheap labor is what everyone is looking for.

only way for the knicks to recoup picks is to trade melo and possibly chandler. nobody else is giving you anything.

Nalod @ 11/26/2013 11:04 AM

"Whats the point"?

Depression lingers.

Don't worry, JRod will be here soon to tell you how silly your being and how your bad vibes are bringing the team down. Then he'll chime about my repressed Net love and ABA afliction to deflect the issue and elevate his UK cheer.

Reality? Charles Barkley is right. What he, and nobody can see is how it gets better. It can. Its why we watch.

Well, why some of you watch. Nalod been out of the country for a while and unplugged for a while. Been catching up on my reading instead of watching bad hoop.

Do real fans watch bad hoop? In the Mecca they do. Im not in the mecca literally for figurativly. I left because Knick management are disingenuious to their fans. No, its not the "NY Dolans" but he is the dude driving the decisions and how the roster is constructed. I'd support them if they rebuilt, made an effort to a better tomorrow.

What gets me is the low return we get. The team is just stuck in being mediocrity and yet we have so little assets to work with going forward. While some teams like Denver might be stuck as well, they have draft picks and a younger core. They COULD get better. We got cap space. So does lots of teams. What good is it if you can't support them? Good for selling tickets.

gunsnewing @ 11/26/2013 11:07 AM
franco12 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:We don't need a PG if the game plan is to dump the ball to Melo and JR and move out the way

even if that is the game plan, I think we need an upgrade as far as the defense is concerned. Get me someone who can at least slow down opposing PGs.

True but going back to the Pacers series this offensive gameplan has been abysmal

misterearl @ 11/26/2013 11:07 AM
The Point

Vmart wrote:Don't forget the over matched coach who has lost the team.

VMart - please pay attention. the coach does not play.

This thread is about matchups.

Thank you for your contribution.

Vmart @ 11/26/2013 11:09 AM
misterearl wrote:The Point

Vmart wrote:Don't forget the over matched coach who has lost the team.

VMart - please pay attention. the coach does not play.

This thread is about matchups.

Thank you for your contribution.

You are right. He just decides the plays and who plays. And apparently it seems he is deciding who shoots and who doesn't.

misterearl @ 11/26/2013 11:10 AM
Defense

gunsnewing wrote:We don't need a PG if the game plan is to dump the ball to Melo and JR and move out the way

Read this again

New York entered play Monday night allowing point guards to score an average of 21 points per game

Who is checking chris Paul?

Vmart @ 11/26/2013 11:12 AM
misterearl wrote:Defense

gunsnewing wrote:We don't need a PG if the game plan is to dump the ball to Melo and JR and move out the way

Read this again

New York entered play Monday night allowing point guards to score an average of 21 points per game

Who has a chris Paul?

Woody says Beno has the point. We all know what the problem is what is your solution?

misterearl @ 11/26/2013 11:15 AM
gunsnewing wrote:

True but going back to the Pacers series this offensive gameplan has been abysmal

Gunsnewing - you write as if an offensive game plan is executed against inanimate objects.

X's and O's are simply diagrams. You need superior people to execute against quality opposition.

We are not competing against cardboard cutouts. Where are the Knicks dominant at any position?

Please point out the matchup where Mike Woodson has an advantage in talent. On offense or defense. Pretty please.

misterearl @ 11/26/2013 11:21 AM
The Answer Man Is Already There

Vmart wrote:
Woody says Beno has the point. We all know what the problem is what is your solution?

A. Marcus Smart

gunsnewing @ 11/26/2013 11:23 AM
See Amare's comments. And Melo's too "yea we get stagnant at times"
Vmart @ 11/26/2013 11:24 AM
misterearl wrote:The Answer Man Is Already There

Vmart wrote:
Woody says Beno has the point. We all know what the problem is what is your solution?

A. Marcus Smart

He is not here? Currently what should the Knicks do? How do they go about getting Marcus Smart the future?

Page 1 of 3