mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
knicks1248 wrote:I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
as long as we get back some nice assets from Chicago i dont give a damn lol
Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY.
I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.
mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
Nalod wrote:Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY. I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.
the rockets still scare the sh1t out of me. that sneak.
I cannot wait for Bosh to actually sign.
Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
I think without though they can't really contend without him.
Nalod wrote:Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY. I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.
Cant make Melo the victim. I mean he wanted this whole free agent tour and he was the one who said publicly he would take less.
mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
I think without though they can't really contend without him.
that never stopped melo from getting his money before. 
Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
I think without though they can't really contend without him.
that never stopped melo from getting his money before.
And thats exactly why he won't sign there.
mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
I think without though they can't really contend without him.
that never stopped melo from getting his money before.
And thats exactly why he won't sign there.
I think it will prove melo just wants the money which most knew anyway
StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
as long as we get back some nice assets from Chicago i dont give a damn lol
they can't get melo unless a sign and trade, phil is not even entertaining the idea, melo doesnt want chicago to gut its team to sign him
StarksEwing1 wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
I think without though they can't really contend without him.
that never stopped melo from getting his money before.
And thats exactly why he won't sign there.
I think it will prove melo just wants the money which most knew anyway
"just wants"??
I think he wants to eat and be healthy and be liked and win and ... all the other stuff that people want
knicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
as long as we get back some nice assets from Chicago i dont give a damn lol
they can't get melo unless a sign and trade, phil is not even entertaining the idea, melo doesnt want chicago to gut its team to sign him
Phil never said that. He said he didnt want Boozer
Nalod wrote:Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY. I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.
They can trade the euros rights . I'm sure he'd love NYC and we are not asking to much for melo... Euro,mcd,boozer and 2 first ... The Knicks are in the drivers seat if melo chooses chitown
mreinman wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:Clean wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:mreinman wrote:dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.
why would he need leverage with the knicks?
i mean he is not in a position to get max money.
huh? its already on the table.
are you sure?
I am not sure about anything, who is.
I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.
I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.
Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
I think without though they can't really contend without him.
that never stopped melo from getting his money before.
And thats exactly why he won't sign there.
I think it will prove melo just wants the money which most knew anyway
"just wants"??
I think he wants to eat and be healthy and be liked and win and ... all the other stuff that people want
i meant the priority was getting the max or most money. I wasnt saying he wants to starve himself or get cancer
