Knicks · Acy to the Knicks (page 4)
knickscity wrote:F500ONE wrote:knickscity wrote:CrushAlot wrote:F500ONE wrote:H1AND1 wrote:F500ONE wrote:Okay I like Quincy Acy he has a major motor although offense needs work.Other than this the trade is not good
How many posters here were high on Jeremy Tyler?I was never high on Tyler, but then again I'm just a fan. Tyler had zero motor so if Acy has a motor he's an upgrade IMO. Nothing about Tyler ever gave me confidence the kid would ever "put it all together" despite his considerable talents.
Okay so Tyler never was a high potential upside player?
All fabricated oversold imagination
Nevertheless ACY is much like Larkin.He'll either lock in the books next year or he won't
Which means we may end up giving Ellington-Tyler-Pick for nothing.That's why the trade isn't good
There's really no fall back.
The pick already belonged to the kings. The kings are waiving both guys they get in the trade. The deal for the Kings was for cap space. They have too many power forwards already. The kings extended the date for when Acy's contract had to be picked up. It probably was done so they could move him.
the pick only belonged to sac if the Knicks stunk the year of the 2016 draft, it was well prtotected.not really concerned with the pick, but felt the need to clarify.
It was Top 37 protected.
If we're good 2015-2016 year they'd get, it if not we'd keep it
So in essence the pick was still ours.It's very much the same nonchalant-cavalier attitude with the Bargs trade and the 2016 1st pick
We should have traded a 2018 second unprotectedWe now for a certainty have no picks in 2016
it's the other way around, the only way sac would have got it is if we were bottom 7 in record aka lotto.But yes, the pick was still ours.
Imo though I think Phil has something he can get done at anytime, but is bolstering the bench first.
I understand Top 37 to mean Top 37.
A 37th pick is a somewhat high second rounder
This would only go to a team who had a bad record 2015-2016
So if we were bad this season we'd keep it, if we were good they get it
What I mean by good, in the playoffs.
Technically they could have received the pick even if we missed the playoffs[8th worst record]
Phisher had to see something in the SL practices and games that they did not like- don't think they would have been so quick to sign Aldrich and then Smith if Tyler had shown them anything.
You never had the feeling that Tyler, with all his great physical ability, could consistently play like a 6'11" player. Should have come in with some new moves in the post, and not rely on his jumper, which is actually great for a big man. I also don't think that Phil and Fish thought he could move the ball around and make decisions they way they wanted him to in the Triangle.
Feel bad losing him, because he's a young guy with potential, but the Knicks want people who can contribute now, I suppose.
Not an Outlaw fan, just a wasted spot on the roster if he is on the team- always looked a bit sickly to me.
Saw Acy have a decent game- probably the one he had against the Knicks, but I have never followed him. Maybe Fisher puts him in when the Knicks are getting pushed around.
Fisher would have seen him play a number of times over the last two years...maybe he saw some things he like when Acy was an opponent.
Hope he keeps the beard.
From what I can see, by the way, Acy has a team option for THIS year as well as next year. When do the Knicks have to pick up the option or let him go?? Has anyone heard whether they are just going to let him go?
EwingsGlass wrote:1) Ellington vs Outlaw is basically a wash. I would prefer to have Ellington, but with the glut of guards, they are just re-configuring the guys sitting at the end of the bench. Best of luck to Ellington, we hardly knew you.2) Tyler vs Acy is a near wash, getting a bit smaller and more defensive. I think one thing people missed was that Tyler is a UFA after this season, Acy is a RFA. In that regard, he has more asset value off the court (assuming all other things are relatively equal). For me, I liked the youthfulness of Tyler and wanted to see him develop. I think that is somewhat replaced with Acy.
3) 2016 pick no longer protected. I guess if we fall into the lottery in 2016 and get a pick 1-8 (and give them both up), the sky will truly have fallen. Given that we have a 2015 target for our capspace, if this was what was necessary to get a deal done, ok. I dont really believe we gave anything up. That said, the toss in of picks is a bad habit. I am not sure why this deal could not get done without the toss in.
Looking forward to seeing Acy's energy. Where does he project in the rotation?
The rotation is gonna be the most difficult decision Fish has this year. I can't really figure it out just now myself. It has to be something that Phil and Fish are no doubt bouncing around right now. Training Camp will determine a lot.
WaltLongmire wrote:So the Tyler era is over, and the Ellington era was aborted.Phisher had to see something in the SL practices and games that they did not like- don't think they would have been so quick to sign Aldrich and then Smith if Tyler had shown them anything.
Feel bad losing him, because he's a young guy with potential, but the Knicks want people who can contribute now, I suppose.
From what I can see, by the way, Acy has a team option for THIS year as well as next year. When do the Knicks have to pick up the option or let him go?? Has anyone heard whether they are just going to let him go?
Somewhat short fuse with Tyler considering this was his first crack at a real system right?
Phil and Fisher didn't think they could reach him
We already contacted ACY's people, we're picking up his option this year
Next year is to be determined, we have a whole season to decide
WaltLongmire wrote:So the Tyler era is over, and the Ellington era was aborted.I was sure the trade was made to get Acy. The only place I saw it suggested that his contract might not be picked up was the, Ball Don't Lie article. But I read somewhere else that the Knicks have already agreed to pick up his contract. The Kings had too many bigs and needed cap relief.Phisher had to see something in the SL practices and games that they did not like- don't think they would have been so quick to sign Aldrich and then Smith if Tyler had shown them anything.
You never had the feeling that Tyler, with all his great physical ability, could consistently play like a 6'11" player. Should have come in with some new moves in the post, and not rely on his jumper, which is actually great for a big man. I also don't think that Phil and Fish thought he could move the ball around and make decisions they way they wanted him to in the Triangle.
Feel bad losing him, because he's a young guy with potential, but the Knicks want people who can contribute now, I suppose.
Not an Outlaw fan, just a wasted spot on the roster if he is on the team- always looked a bit sickly to me.Saw Acy have a decent game- probably the one he had against the Knicks, but I have never followed him. Maybe Fisher puts him in when the Knicks are getting pushed around.
Fisher would have seen him play a number of times over the last two years...maybe he saw some things he like when Acy was an opponent.
Hope he keeps the beard.
From what I can see, by the way, Acy has a team option for THIS year as well as next year. When do the Knicks have to pick up the option or let him go?? Has anyone heard whether they are just going to let him go?
F500ONE wrote:I believe Tyler was the only non guaranteed deal the Knicks had that could be moved. Also, I think the organization has seen enough of Tyler to make a decision like this on him. Kings are waiving him. What does that say about Mike Malone?WaltLongmire wrote:So the Tyler era is over, and the Ellington era was aborted.Phisher had to see something in the SL practices and games that they did not like- don't think they would have been so quick to sign Aldrich and then Smith if Tyler had shown them anything.
Feel bad losing him, because he's a young guy with potential, but the Knicks want people who can contribute now, I suppose.
From what I can see, by the way, Acy has a team option for THIS year as well as next year. When do the Knicks have to pick up the option or let him go?? Has anyone heard whether they are just going to let him go?
Somewhat short fuse with Tyler considering this was his first crack at a real system right?
Phil and Fisher didn't think they could reach him
We already contacted ACY's people, we're picking up his option this yearNext year is to be determined, we have a whole season to decide
CrushAlot wrote:F500ONE wrote:I believe Tyler was the only non guaranteed deal the Knicks had that could be moved. Also, I think the organization has seen enough of Tyler to make a decision like this on him. Kings are waiving him. What does that say about Mike Malone?WaltLongmire wrote:So the Tyler era is over, and the Ellington era was aborted.Phisher had to see something in the SL practices and games that they did not like- don't think they would have been so quick to sign Aldrich and then Smith if Tyler had shown them anything.
Feel bad losing him, because he's a young guy with potential, but the Knicks want people who can contribute now, I suppose.
From what I can see, by the way, Acy has a team option for THIS year as well as next year. When do the Knicks have to pick up the option or let him go?? Has anyone heard whether they are just going to let him go?
Somewhat short fuse with Tyler considering this was his first crack at a real system right?
Phil and Fisher didn't think they could reach him
We already contacted ACY's people, we're picking up his option this yearNext year is to be determined, we have a whole season to decide
Says he's not familiar with Tyler like we were and they are probably booked on roster spots.
Back at the ranch Thenansis looks more and more like an overseas stash after trade
smackeddog wrote:I really don't like having Travis Outlaw as our backup SF- he's isn't good at anything and he isn't a three point shooter. He was never good to begin with and lost even that years ago
Mills says that they like Early and that Outlaw is basically insurance in case Early has issues. Early is really the back up SF unless he really has problems. IMO if Outlaw is playing Early wasn't ready.
F500ONE wrote:CrushAlot wrote:F500ONE wrote:I believe Tyler was the only non guaranteed deal the Knicks had that could be moved. Also, I think the organization has seen enough of Tyler to make a decision like this on him. Kings are waiving him. What does that say about Mike Malone?WaltLongmire wrote:So the Tyler era is over, and the Ellington era was aborted.Phisher had to see something in the SL practices and games that they did not like- don't think they would have been so quick to sign Aldrich and then Smith if Tyler had shown them anything.
Feel bad losing him, because he's a young guy with potential, but the Knicks want people who can contribute now, I suppose.
From what I can see, by the way, Acy has a team option for THIS year as well as next year. When do the Knicks have to pick up the option or let him go?? Has anyone heard whether they are just going to let him go?
Somewhat short fuse with Tyler considering this was his first crack at a real system right?
Phil and Fisher didn't think they could reach him
We already contacted ACY's people, we're picking up his option this yearNext year is to be determined, we have a whole season to decide
Says he's not familiar with Tyler like we were and they are probably booked on roster spots.
Back at the ranch Thenansis looks more and more like an overseas stash after trade
Tyler is 23. He is an incredible physical specimen. He has been waived 3 times and is on his fourth team. Maybe he gets signed by Philly, gets minutes and turns into a player. He appeared to have conditioning issues at the start of the summer league. Some of this is on him.
WaltLongmire wrote:So the Tyler era is over, and the Ellington era was aborted.Phisher had to see something in the SL practices and games that they did not like- don't think they would have been so quick to sign Aldrich and then Smith if Tyler had shown them anything.
You never had the feeling that Tyler, with all his great physical ability, could consistently play like a 6'11" player. Should have come in with some new moves in the post, and not rely on his jumper, which is actually great for a big man. I also don't think that Phil and Fish thought he could move the ball around and make decisions they way they wanted him to in the Triangle.
Feel bad losing him, because he's a young guy with potential, but the Knicks want people who can contribute now, I suppose.
Not an Outlaw fan, just a wasted spot on the roster if he is on the team- always looked a bit sickly to me.Saw Acy have a decent game- probably the one he had against the Knicks, but I have never followed him. Maybe Fisher puts him in when the Knicks are getting pushed around.
Fisher would have seen him play a number of times over the last two years...maybe he saw some things he like when Acy was an opponent.
Hope he keeps the beard.
From what I can see, by the way, Acy has a team option for THIS year as well as next year. When do the Knicks have to pick up the option or let him go?? Has anyone heard whether they are just going to let him go?
Having a hard time understanding why people keep referring to losing a "young" guy like Tyler. Tyler is 23 and Acy is 24....so youth is not the issue. I liked Tyler's potential, but Acy appears to have been acquired because of his D, toughness and hustle.....also his contract is very favorable with the Knicks holding team options for the next two years in a contract that is only around $1 million. Outlaw offers 1 year of roster protection (at $3 mil) as insurance for Early's development. I didn't like giving up the 2nd rounder - but understand as the Knicks are taking an educated gamble that Sacramento would have the pick anyway....even without the trade.
This is the type of non-flashy sound move that you want your GM to make to build a solid roster foundation. Aquire a guy who you will control for the next 2 years at a very low salary and hope he turns into an Oakley type player. If not, his salary will make him tradeable along the way. Very smart move.
nixluva wrote:smackeddog wrote:I really don't like having Travis Outlaw as our backup SF- he's isn't good at anything and he isn't a three point shooter. He was never good to begin with and lost even that years ago
Mills says that they like Early and that Outlaw is basically insurance in case Early has issues. Early is really the back up SF unless he really has problems. IMO if Outlaw is playing Early wasn't ready.
healthy competition in practice....if Early is ready, prove it and beat out a 29 year old vet that wants to stay in the league.
Clean wrote:I ended up finding a video of when he was killing the Knicks.
Its really impressive to see the way he singlehandedly wins the game over the last 3 minutes. But then you realize was a PRESEASON game....
Phil is building even this years team in the mold of what he wants the team to be and the only thing that will change as we move forward is the quality of the players in those roles. Phil's targeting similar players like Thanasis and Acy shows a window into what he thinks the team needs. A great shooting PG like Jose is basically a tradition for Phil so no mystery there. If you look at his past teams he always has a big like Jason Smith. There's a method to his madness.
smackeddog wrote:F500ONE wrote:NardDogNation wrote:I love Acy's game and think that this was a solid move. For those that don't know who to compare him to, he is something of a more polished Reggie Evans/Ivan Johnson type. He'll be a rotation player off the bench for us. Kudos to Phil.I saw Tyler play quite a bit in Summer League.
I wonder if the triangle was too much for him to grasp
Quincy also played this summer I believeThe thing that struck me with Tyler in the summer league was his terrible conditioning- he was huffing and puffing from day one- very disappointing.
The problem with Tyler is that he has basketball IQ like a Highschool kid.....I know on defense, his lateral quickness sucks. I've seen during the regular season and even summer league, he doesn't have the foot speed to keep up. Before you know it, someone just drove by him for a high light dunk. He's a soft Euro type big, with a jumper. We already have enough of those types.
And eventhough Tyler and Acy are close to the same age, Acy plays like a grown man....A power type forward we need. Tyler is too soft to play center and too slow to play against todays PF's....When Tyler turns 29 or 30....he will be a beast.....But we don't have that kind of time, and we need guys like Acy more than guys like Tyler. I'm sure Phil wanted to keep him, but he had to make a sacrifice. And this is coming from a Tyler fan....But summer league showed him weaknesses on defense, even though his jumper was nice.
Once Sac cuts him, I wouldn't be surprised if Phil picked him up, if we had an open spot. But Phil is tryin to build a team for the Melo era....which is now! I think Acy is a keeper.....If not, his value is slightly higher than Tyler, and will be used in a future trade. These are the kinds of non sexy moves the knicks need.
blkexec wrote:Once Sac cuts him, I wouldn't be surprised if Phil picked him up, if we had an open spot. But Phil is tryin to build a team for the Melo era....which is now! I think Acy is a keeper.....If not, his value is slightly higher than Tyler, and will be used in a future trade. These are the kinds of non sexy moves the knicks need.
Yeah Phil has a clear vision of what he wants to do with this team. People seem to forget that Phil was watching this team for a while and i'm sure he watched a lot of game tape and broke it down too. He knows a lot about the players we have and what he thinks they can bring to the table and then he made a list of changes he needed to make to improve the team and mold it into his vision of what a team should have. Unlike our other GM's Phil isn't just winging it. He has a blueprint for what he feels makes a good team.