Knicks · How about brags and Jose to the lakers for Nash and Lin (page 3)

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Since nobody else has said it on a Jose thread, Stretch Provision. I liked the idea but it would be difficult to pull off this trade.

difficult?

Its trade rape.

That is true, but also weigh in the fact that the Lakers front office arn't exactly the smartest ones out there. So as I said it would be difficult and unlikely

haha .... there is dumb and there is bargs-trade dumb. Nobody is bargs trade dumb.

Lol we are

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Since nobody else has said it on a Jose thread, Stretch Provision. I liked the idea but it would be difficult to pull off this trade.

difficult?

Its trade rape.

That is true, but also weigh in the fact that the Lakers front office arn't exactly the smartest ones out there. So as I said it would be difficult and unlikely

haha .... there is dumb and there is bargs-trade dumb. Nobody is bargs trade dumb.

Lol we are

we were ... :-)

mreinman wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:In a perfect world what the article said about Jose is true, teams still has interest in him. So Phil tries to use that to unload bargs but that's just a ploy. Really he just wants to get rid of Calderon and not take anything back.

when I mean bargs trade dumb I mean the NY Toronto trade.

This trade is dumb because Jose is signed for 2 years after this one at 7.5ish.

Why would LA take that on for expirings?

Answer: They wouldn't in a million years but these threads are fun

My post was a general post and not really about the possibilities of this trade. There are zero possibilities that the Lakers trade with Ny