Knicks · Miami got the steal of the draft (page 2)
StarksEwing1 wrote:fishmike wrote:love his shooting. Just needs to bulk up a littlefranco12 wrote:hard to picture that bad an outcome unless PK gets hurt. At 19 he put up Karl Town's numbers against men, not 6'7 kids from small programs who will never go pro.fishmike wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:sure he would have been. I like a lot about him. When he's a nice player in a couple years and Zinga is dropping 20/10 with 3 blocks a night and is an all star he would still be good for us. Phil went with the higher upside.fishmike wrote:still would have been good for us.franco12 wrote:Shane Battier! That is the player I thought he could end up being like at the NBA level - not a great individual offensive game, strong defender - able to hit big, game winning shots when open.Winslow is more muscle and less IQ, but thats not a bad compare. I see a Caron Butler Wilson Chandler hybrid... but sureI think you could see Detroit and Charlotte were zero'd in on guys and maybe not thinking about taking a player that dropped to them.
But at least Winslow would be in NY where he could really "build his brand"
(his words, NOT mine)
See how this works?
Winslow to me was the safe pick - and that's probably why he dropped. At 4, I want to get more than 'just a starter'
Porzingis is a swing for the fences, change the fortune of the franchise for 10+ years - and that is what you need out of 4.
I'm ok with Phil if Porzingis is out of the league in 3-4 years and Winslow is having a steady career. He tried, gambled and lost. But at least he rolled the dice.
Where it hurts most is the fact that we don't own our own pick next year - and that is not on Phil. If we had our own pick, I think people would be freaking out just a bit less.
One thing you read in every scouting reports is KP's quickness and ability as a help defender. You know he can shoot. You know he can dunk and is pretty explosive.
Fish(mike, not derek) brought up the comparison to Tayshun Prince - thinking back, he never bulked up- and i certainly never thought he could have been nearly as effective as he was.
I think we might (hoping) be surprised by what Porzingis gives us.
franco12 wrote:which is why I can see PK as a top 5 NBA player in a few years. What does it is his athletic ability. Knicks and Phil had him in for a private workout, and while he had cramps and didnt finish he DID finish the athletic testing portion which resulted in Phil's eye opening athlete comments.StarksEwing1 wrote:fishmike wrote:love his shooting. Just needs to bulk up a littlefranco12 wrote:hard to picture that bad an outcome unless PK gets hurt. At 19 he put up Karl Town's numbers against men, not 6'7 kids from small programs who will never go pro.fishmike wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:sure he would have been. I like a lot about him. When he's a nice player in a couple years and Zinga is dropping 20/10 with 3 blocks a night and is an all star he would still be good for us. Phil went with the higher upside.fishmike wrote:still would have been good for us.franco12 wrote:Shane Battier! That is the player I thought he could end up being like at the NBA level - not a great individual offensive game, strong defender - able to hit big, game winning shots when open.Winslow is more muscle and less IQ, but thats not a bad compare. I see a Caron Butler Wilson Chandler hybrid... but sureI think you could see Detroit and Charlotte were zero'd in on guys and maybe not thinking about taking a player that dropped to them.
But at least Winslow would be in NY where he could really "build his brand"
(his words, NOT mine)
See how this works?
Winslow to me was the safe pick - and that's probably why he dropped. At 4, I want to get more than 'just a starter'
Porzingis is a swing for the fences, change the fortune of the franchise for 10+ years - and that is what you need out of 4.
I'm ok with Phil if Porzingis is out of the league in 3-4 years and Winslow is having a steady career. He tried, gambled and lost. But at least he rolled the dice.
Where it hurts most is the fact that we don't own our own pick next year - and that is not on Phil. If we had our own pick, I think people would be freaking out just a bit less.
One thing you read in every scouting reports is KP's quickness and ability as a help defender. You know he can shoot. You know he can dunk and is pretty explosive.
Fish(mike, not derek) brought up the comparison to Tayshun Prince - thinking back, he never bulked up- and i certainly never thought he could have been nearly as effective as he was.
I think we might (hoping) be surprised by what Porzingis gives us.
Let me simply ask this...
If Prince was 6'9 with a 7'2 wingpan and as effective as he was, how would you feel about a similar player who was 7'1 with a 7'6 wingpan and a more developed offensive game and more strenth and more altheticism? In todays no position NBA this guy could be bonafid franchise changer. Winslow has that ceiling? I dont see it
fishmike wrote:agreed. I meant that it was a steal he fell to them. He was projected top 6 i believefranco12 wrote:which is why I can see PK as a top 5 NBA player in a few years. What does it is his athletic ability. Knicks and Phil had him in for a private workout, and while he had cramps and didnt finish he DID finish the athletic testing portion which resulted in Phil's eye opening athlete comments.StarksEwing1 wrote:fishmike wrote:love his shooting. Just needs to bulk up a littlefranco12 wrote:hard to picture that bad an outcome unless PK gets hurt. At 19 he put up Karl Town's numbers against men, not 6'7 kids from small programs who will never go pro.fishmike wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:sure he would have been. I like a lot about him. When he's a nice player in a couple years and Zinga is dropping 20/10 with 3 blocks a night and is an all star he would still be good for us. Phil went with the higher upside.fishmike wrote:still would have been good for us.franco12 wrote:Shane Battier! That is the player I thought he could end up being like at the NBA level - not a great individual offensive game, strong defender - able to hit big, game winning shots when open.Winslow is more muscle and less IQ, but thats not a bad compare. I see a Caron Butler Wilson Chandler hybrid... but sureI think you could see Detroit and Charlotte were zero'd in on guys and maybe not thinking about taking a player that dropped to them.
But at least Winslow would be in NY where he could really "build his brand"
(his words, NOT mine)
See how this works?
Winslow to me was the safe pick - and that's probably why he dropped. At 4, I want to get more than 'just a starter'
Porzingis is a swing for the fences, change the fortune of the franchise for 10+ years - and that is what you need out of 4.
I'm ok with Phil if Porzingis is out of the league in 3-4 years and Winslow is having a steady career. He tried, gambled and lost. But at least he rolled the dice.
Where it hurts most is the fact that we don't own our own pick next year - and that is not on Phil. If we had our own pick, I think people would be freaking out just a bit less.
One thing you read in every scouting reports is KP's quickness and ability as a help defender. You know he can shoot. You know he can dunk and is pretty explosive.
Fish(mike, not derek) brought up the comparison to Tayshun Prince - thinking back, he never bulked up- and i certainly never thought he could have been nearly as effective as he was.
I think we might (hoping) be surprised by what Porzingis gives us.
Let me simply ask this...
If Prince was 6'9 with a 7'2 wingpan and as effective as he was, how would you feel about a similar player who was 7'1 with a 7'6 wingpan and a more developed offensive game and more strenth and more altheticism? In todays no position NBA this guy could be bonafid franchise changer. Winslow has that ceiling? I dont see it
StarksEwing1 wrote:fishmike wrote:agreed. I meant that it was a steal he fell to them. He was projected top 6 i believefranco12 wrote:which is why I can see PK as a top 5 NBA player in a few years. What does it is his athletic ability. Knicks and Phil had him in for a private workout, and while he had cramps and didnt finish he DID finish the athletic testing portion which resulted in Phil's eye opening athlete comments.StarksEwing1 wrote:fishmike wrote:love his shooting. Just needs to bulk up a littlefranco12 wrote:hard to picture that bad an outcome unless PK gets hurt. At 19 he put up Karl Town's numbers against men, not 6'7 kids from small programs who will never go pro.fishmike wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:sure he would have been. I like a lot about him. When he's a nice player in a couple years and Zinga is dropping 20/10 with 3 blocks a night and is an all star he would still be good for us. Phil went with the higher upside.fishmike wrote:still would have been good for us.franco12 wrote:Shane Battier! That is the player I thought he could end up being like at the NBA level - not a great individual offensive game, strong defender - able to hit big, game winning shots when open.Winslow is more muscle and less IQ, but thats not a bad compare. I see a Caron Butler Wilson Chandler hybrid... but sureI think you could see Detroit and Charlotte were zero'd in on guys and maybe not thinking about taking a player that dropped to them.
But at least Winslow would be in NY where he could really "build his brand"
(his words, NOT mine)
See how this works?
Winslow to me was the safe pick - and that's probably why he dropped. At 4, I want to get more than 'just a starter'
Porzingis is a swing for the fences, change the fortune of the franchise for 10+ years - and that is what you need out of 4.
I'm ok with Phil if Porzingis is out of the league in 3-4 years and Winslow is having a steady career. He tried, gambled and lost. But at least he rolled the dice.
Where it hurts most is the fact that we don't own our own pick next year - and that is not on Phil. If we had our own pick, I think people would be freaking out just a bit less.
One thing you read in every scouting reports is KP's quickness and ability as a help defender. You know he can shoot. You know he can dunk and is pretty explosive.
Fish(mike, not derek) brought up the comparison to Tayshun Prince - thinking back, he never bulked up- and i certainly never thought he could have been nearly as effective as he was.
I think we might (hoping) be surprised by what Porzingis gives us.
Let me simply ask this...
If Prince was 6'9 with a 7'2 wingpan and as effective as he was, how would you feel about a similar player who was 7'1 with a 7'6 wingpan and a more developed offensive game and more strenth and more altheticism? In todays no position NBA this guy could be bonafid franchise changer. Winslow has that ceiling? I dont see it
He's like WCS without the foot issue and an offensive game!
that doesn't mean it can't work out .. if we have a plan in place to mold him into the player he needs to be then i can see where some of the risks are mitigated and you have closer to a good decision.. but if this is just another one of those pick and pray he figures it out then it is objectively just bad all around...
franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:sure he would have been. I like a lot about him. When he's a nice player in a couple years and Zinga is dropping 20/10 with 3 blocks a night and is an all star he would still be good for us. Phil went with the higher upside.fishmike wrote:still would have been good for us.franco12 wrote:Shane Battier! That is the player I thought he could end up being like at the NBA level - not a great individual offensive game, strong defender - able to hit big, game winning shots when open.Winslow is more muscle and less IQ, but thats not a bad compare. I see a Caron Butler Wilson Chandler hybrid... but sureI think you could see Detroit and Charlotte were zero'd in on guys and maybe not thinking about taking a player that dropped to them.
But at least Winslow would be in NY where he could really "build his brand"
(his words, NOT mine)
See how this works?
Winslow to me was the safe pick - and that's probably why he dropped. At 4, I want to get more than 'just a starter'
Porzingis is a swing for the fences, change the fortune of the franchise for 10+ years - and that is what you need out of 4.
I'm ok with Phil if Porzingis is out of the league in 3-4 years and Winslow is having a steady career. He tried, gambled and lost. But at least he rolled the dice.
Where it hurts most is the fact that we don't own our own pick next year - and that is not on Phil. If we had our own pick, I think people would be freaking out just a bit less.
Yeah I agree , I have this nightmare we will miss the playoffs and Denver will win the lottery and get a franchise cornerstone for a decade.
We do not have the DEFENSIVE players to compliment Winslow and if we drafted him, it would be like Iman Shumpert all over again, without Lebron James, or at minimum a Jimmy Butler/Kawaii Leanard to pair with him
I am willing to wait a couple of years before we fully evaluate the moves that Phil Jackson is trying to fix
From our roster, rebuilding our management, development/coaching staff, and repairing relationships that majority of franchise HATE US, making us overpay for every trade and not selling picks to us but willing to sell it to other teams
Truth is we get SO MUCH MEDIA ATTENTION, MORE THAN ANY OTHER TEAM EVEN WHEN WE SUCK, and we STILL HAVE WORLDWIDE FANS EVERYWHERE
Phil Jackson is NOT DOING A QUICK FIX
While I do not know if The Triangle is the best choice that we MUST INCORPORATE, I LIKE WHAT PHIL JACKSON IS TRYING TO DO, REBUILDING and REPAIRING EVERYTHING that is wrong with our franchise for life beyond his 5year contract