crzymdups wrote:fishmike wrote:these daily threads are silly. Knicks need to develop their talent base. KP and Willy are a good start. This kind or that kind doesnt matter. We just need to continue to add and build.
Agree... but we've been burned quite recently for winning meaningless games. The year before Westbrook and Love went directly ahead of the Knicks taking Gallinari (who was a nice piece... but...)
And the Timberwolves took both Rubio and Flynn before Curry.
Easy to identify what is needed.
Easy to look in hindsight.
Not so easy to actually do it.
We lose to nets and a few articles written about how we suck. Duh.
If we won, we'd be blowing the Tank.
Nets lauded for their "togetherness". Nice story. 12 wins. Good for them.
Knicks are a mess. Thats obvious.
Tatum at Duke had a very nice weekend. Is he the one?? Knicks need an athletic 4 man.
Ok? Who? How?
I need 2 million to retire.
I agree--but we need ballers, shot callers, 20 inch blades on the Impala
I mean there's got to be a better way, better way, yeah ehhh
Nalod wrote:crzymdups wrote:fishmike wrote:these daily threads are silly. Knicks need to develop their talent base. KP and Willy are a good start. This kind or that kind doesnt matter. We just need to continue to add and build.
Agree... but we've been burned quite recently for winning meaningless games. The year before Westbrook and Love went directly ahead of the Knicks taking Gallinari (who was a nice piece... but...)
And the Timberwolves took both Rubio and Flynn before Curry.
Easy to identify what is needed.
Easy to look in hindsight.
Not so easy to actually do it.
We lose to nets and a few articles written about how we suck. Duh.
If we won, we'd be blowing the Tank.
Nets lauded for their "togetherness". Nice story. 12 wins. Good for them.
Knicks are a mess. Thats obvious.
Tatum at Duke had a very nice weekend. Is he the one?? Knicks need an athletic 4 man.
Ok? Who? How?
I need 2 million to retire.
I'm not here to litigate the Wolves picks. The point is that the Knicks coveted Steph Curry and if they'd been one pick higher, they could've had him. That's literally the only point.
crzymdups wrote:Nalod wrote:crzymdups wrote:fishmike wrote:these daily threads are silly. Knicks need to develop their talent base. KP and Willy are a good start. This kind or that kind doesnt matter. We just need to continue to add and build.
Agree... but we've been burned quite recently for winning meaningless games. The year before Westbrook and Love went directly ahead of the Knicks taking Gallinari (who was a nice piece... but...)
And the Timberwolves took both Rubio and Flynn before Curry.
Easy to identify what is needed.
Easy to look in hindsight.
Not so easy to actually do it.
We lose to nets and a few articles written about how we suck. Duh.
If we won, we'd be blowing the Tank.
Nets lauded for their "togetherness". Nice story. 12 wins. Good for them.
Knicks are a mess. Thats obvious.
Tatum at Duke had a very nice weekend. Is he the one?? Knicks need an athletic 4 man.
Ok? Who? How?
I need 2 million to retire.
I'm not here to litigate the Wolves picks. The point is that the Knicks coveted Steph Curry and if they'd been one pick higher, they could've had him. That's literally the only point.
Let it go man........let it go!!!!!
