Knicks · Knicks interested in D. Rose....Again! (page 8)
StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
I was expecting Clyde to put a little positive spin on the idea of acquiring Rose. Nope, nothing. Based on how much I respect Clyde’s knowledge, it made me feel even worse about a possible trade.
StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Macri even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
He has been a high usage, 20+ min a game player for years. He will get his minutes. Maybe even more since Thibs doesn't seem to give a eff about load management. Will it be Payton's or IQ's. We know Thibs loves his vets. This move maybe seem simple, but the consequences could be major.
BigDaddyG wrote:AgreeStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
He has been a high usage, 20+ min a game player for years. He will get his minutes. Maybe even more since Thibs doesn't seem to give a eff about load management. Will it be Payton's or IQ's. We know Thibs loves his vets. This move maybe seem simple, but the consequences could be major.
StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
If you want to move on fine, but this thread is about the Knicks acquiring Rose, right?
On that note this is an open post directed at everyone but you...
Granted he isn't the shooter that they need, but the other need the Knicks had was scoring. The Knicks just acquired a player known for his scoring, whose role has been off the bench for years now. They traded a piece they had less than no use for and that is not any of pick that everyone wants to keep. They upgraded their talent level for minimal cost. And possibly, IMO, opened up an avenue for Quickley to start with minimal pressure of orchestrating the offense while not losing scoring off the bench.
Regarding Thibs, People worried about Gibson stealing minutes he hasn't. Everyone is crying about Payton starting but this team is as I type 11-13-a record no one thought they would have-with him starting. They are playing competitively every game, even against teams they have no business competing against.
Please, anyone but StarksEwing1 since he has moved on, tell me where I am wrong.
joec32033 wrote:Chill out dude 😂. I never said you couldnt speak your mind.StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
If you want to move on fine, but this thread is about the Knicks acquiring Rose, right?
On that note this is an open post directed at everyone but you...
Granted he isn't the shooter that they need, but the other need the Knicks had was scoring. The Knicks just acquired a player known for his scoring, whose role has been off the bench for years now. They traded a piece they had less than no use for and that is not any of pick that everyone wants to keep. They upgraded their talent level for minimal cost. And possibly, IMO, opened up an avenue for Quickley to start with minimal pressure of orchestrating the offense while not losing scoring off the bench.
Regarding Thibs, People worried about Gibson stealing minutes he hasn't. Everyone is crying about Payton starting but this team is as I type 11-13-a record no one thought they would have-with him starting. They are playing competitively every game, even against teams they have no business competing against.
Please, anyone but StarksEwing1 since he has moved on, tell me where I am wrong.
BigDaddyG wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
He has been a high usage, 20+ min a game player for years. He will get his minutes. Maybe even more since Thibs doesn't seem to give a eff about load management. Will it be Payton's or IQ's. We know Thibs loves his vets. This move maybe seem simple, but the consequences could be major.
But load management had nothing to do with Rose coming off the bench in Detroit. Since he left, Roses's MPG have been 19, 12, 27, 26(this year he was a viable 6th man of the year candidate), 23.
joec32033 wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
He has been a high usage, 20+ min a game player for years. He will get his minutes. Maybe even more since Thibs doesn't seem to give a eff about load management. Will it be Payton's or IQ's. We know Thibs loves his vets. This move maybe seem simple, but the consequences could be major.But load management had nothing to do with Rose coming off the bench in Detroit. Since he left, Roses's MPG have been 19, 12, 27, 26(this year he was a viable 6th man of the year candidate), 23.
You mean 17,27, 26 (Rose played for three teams in 2017-2018). Take out that blip (where he was expected to play support roles for teams featuring LeBron and Jimmy Butler) and he has been a high usage, 20+ min gunner. This move doesn't make sense. Also, load management played a significant but ole in his minutes distribution.
BigDaddyG wrote:Absolutely makes no sensejoec32033 wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
He has been a high usage, 20+ min a game player for years. He will get his minutes. Maybe even more since Thibs doesn't seem to give a eff about load management. Will it be Payton's or IQ's. We know Thibs loves his vets. This move maybe seem simple, but the consequences could be major.But load management had nothing to do with Rose coming off the bench in Detroit. Since he left, Roses's MPG have been 19, 12, 27, 26(this year he was a viable 6th man of the year candidate), 23.
You mean 17,27, 26 (Rose played for three teams in 2017-2018). Take out that blip (where he was expected to play support roles for teams featuring LeBron and Jimmy Butler) and he has been a high usage, 20+ min gunner. This move doesn't make sense.
BigDaddyG wrote:joec32033 wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I think you’re misinterpreting. Nobody is saying “it’s an apocalypse”. We simply feel it makes no sense which is a legit thought. Rose is going to probably Decent minutes and won’t be surprised if he starts. Anyway let’s just agree to disagree and move onStarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:I’m not quoting anything. I’m going by what I know if Rose and since he was here already. Honestly there is no good reason to bring him here to play him big minutes when we have IQ and otters who can actually defend. Even his offense is t what close to what it once was. If we got a shooter I would have been happy but Rose makes zero sense. Usually in a trade you have some fans who like it. This trade pretty much unanimously is not liked which tells you something 😂StarksEwing1 wrote:joec32033 wrote:. Yeah I’m sure they do 😂ToddTT wrote:Clyde’s not a fan of acquiring Rose either, based on his comments during this afternoon’s game.Heat announcers thought it was a good trade.
Aren't we just quoting reactions without knowing what is actually going on?
This trade is pretty much unanimously unlike by a freaking message board. Marriage even called out people treating it as a "travesty" about 7 posts up. This is literally people crying because of the player, not realizing it isn't the player who was here years ago. He has been a bench player for YEARS now. He is being coached by a coach he has respect for.
Literally everything is different than it was before.
I am not even saying I like the trade. To me it is an eh trade to solidify the bench, it is a trade trading a useless piece for a usable one. Nothing more nothing less. There are no signs this is the apocalypse some guys here are making this out to be.
He has been a high usage, 20+ min a game player for years. He will get his minutes. Maybe even more since Thibs doesn't seem to give a eff about load management. Will it be Payton's or IQ's. We know Thibs loves his vets. This move maybe seem simple, but the consequences could be major.But load management had nothing to do with Rose coming off the bench in Detroit. Since he left, Roses's MPG have been 19, 12, 27, 26(this year he was a viable 6th man of the year candidate), 23.
You mean 17,27, 26 (Rose played for three teams in 2017-2018). Take out that blip (where he was expected to play support roles for teams featuring LeBron and Jimmy Butler) and he has been a high usage, 20+ min gunner. This move doesn't make sense. Also, load management played a significant but ole in his minutes distribution.
I missed the split from Cleveland and Minnesota, thanks for catching that. Point being those minutes came off the bench in Detroit for 2 years. And it isn't like he is playing crazy unproductive minutes. He was putting up quality minutes.