Pistons will be horrible again. Still no identity and so many other teams got better still
Chandler wrote:Pistons will be horrible again. Still no identity and so many other teams got better still
Another example of how well tanking works.
Clean wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:DLeethal wrote:It’s hard being backup to a 30ppg scorer. We saw that with Deuce who is a good young player but our offense cratered when Brunson sat. Reed as backup to Mitch would probably be good. Drummond gives them some offensive chops so they probably feel better with him backing up Embiid.
Philly signing Drummond sounded to me like a blocking move to make sure we didn’t do it. The Knicks likely didn’t have their ducks in a row on the Bridges trade and were holding out waiting in IHart. Nearly all the Centers were snapped up by the time iHart made his decision. Drummond matches the Knicks system too well. Just fills the block when Embiid is out in Philly.
They wanted Drummond from last season. Theyhttp://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/forum.asp?f=2 had a trade close with the Bulls for him for 2 2nd round picks but the bulls backed out to try and make the playoffs.Edit: My fault it was 3 2nd round picks.
Drummond spent a season in Philly doing this role - was already a known quantity to them. I'm surprised he settled for $5mm. Feels like if he saw this center market develop there was more money for him. Its a good situation for him/them either way.
Philly is a very old team with a lot of balky knees. We'll see how their season plays out. Maxey will make them competitive no matter what.
KnickDanger wrote:Chandler wrote:Pistons will be horrible again. Still no identity and so many other teams got better still
Another example of how well tanking works.
they are probably tanking again. Tough to explain their decisions otherwise
Chandler wrote:KnickDanger wrote:Chandler wrote:Pistons will be horrible again. Still no identity and so many other teams got better still
Another example of how well tanking works.
they are probably tanking again. Tough to explain their decisions otherwise
Sneak awful vet signings for the tank with Tobias, THJr, Malik Beasley and the young studs of Duren, Cade, Ivey, Holland, Asur Thompson?
Tobias is like, I got this been doing it for years in Philly.
martin wrote:
I don't fucking know what that means. 🤷🤦
martin wrote:Chandler wrote:KnickDanger wrote:Chandler wrote:Pistons will be horrible again. Still no identity and so many other teams got better still
Another example of how well tanking works.
they are probably tanking again. Tough to explain their decisions otherwise
Sneak awful vet signings for the tank with Tobias, THJr, Malik Beasley and the young studs of Duren, Cade, Ivey, Holland, Asur Thompson?
Tobias is like, I got this been doing it for years in Philly.
Detroit needs to sign Al Harrington
So-
2 second rounders still unsigned (McCullar, Big Mermaid). Probably getting 2 ways, but thinking they'd be signed before the start of Summer League (still a few days off).
Achiuwa remains unsigned and unrestricted on the market.
Knicks just waiting things out/staying patient or is there something still brewing out there sign and trade wise?
Clippers offered PG 2yrs 30M. Sixers paid him 4/212M.
Daniel Theis to the Pelicans. Think he is a useful depth piece, but not certainly not an impact guy. Good at setting screens and crashes the boards.
MaTT4281 wrote:
Mo money, mo problems.
if he signs this extension it will be a game changer of someone backing up their statements about winning being more important than money.
Does what extend he sign really matter? We will be over 2nd apron either way. This is a real question to the people who know more about the new cap rules.
ToddTT wrote:MaTT4281 wrote:
Mo money, mo problems.
If Brunson signs the extension noted - could he open up additional cap space for us over and above the $16.9 (?) or so we have right now?
Rookie wrote:Clippers offered PG 2yrs 30M. Sixers paid him 4/212M.
Lmao
NYKBocker wrote:martin wrote:
I don't fucking know what that means. 🤷🤦
It means that those teams cannot have their salary cap total more than the total of that particular apron.
Bobby is listing why each team is capped at either first or second aprons (which is just fancy word for limit). It is why the first or second aprons were triggered.
So, Atlanta was involved in some sort of sign and trade, and because of that the first apron rule was triggered, and now, for the length of this season, they cannot take in any more salary where a trade would put their total team salary above the first apron of $178M.
If you weren’t being sarcastic 😅
martin wrote:NYKBocker wrote:martin wrote:
I don't fucking know what that means.
It means that those teams cannot have their salary cap total more than the total of that particular apron.Bobby is listing why each team is capped at either first or second aprons (which is just fancy word for limit). It is why the first or second aprons were triggered.
So, Atlanta was involved in some sort of sign and trade, and because of that the first apron rule was triggered, and now, for the length of this season, they cannot take in any more salary where a trade would put their total team salary above the first apron of $178M.
If you weren;t being sarcastic
so the Knicks are hard capped because of "aggregation"? Who made these ducking rules?
Charles Bassey waived by Spurs. Kid hasn’t been able to stay healthy but always has had good potential. Would be a decent buy low situation if he is healthy.
