Knicks · Around the NBA, 2023 Free Agency: Let the madness begin! (page 34)
nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
They did not, that trade cleared about 13m between Kemba and the #11 picks salary. We were right at the salary cap before the trade. We still needed to move Burks and Noel to create room for Brunson but without unloading the first 13m in that trade we wouldn't have enough.
All in all DET was the team that really helped us land Brunson and it was b/c we got them their man in Duren.
EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
Assuming for a money that your math works, without checking roster holds and cap holds, they didn’t KNOW that all they would need was $25mm when they made that cap clearing trade. They could have been in a bidding war with Dallas. They could have had a bidding war with any other team in the league. You cannot look back with 20/20 vision and criticize a cap clearing move that made it possible to sign a FA and say they cleared too much cap because the FA signed for less than the entire cap space.
That’s just bad analysis.
EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
Assuming for a money that your math works, without checking roster holds and cap holds, they didn’t KNOW that all they would need was $25mm when they made that cap clearing trade. They could have been in a bidding war with Dallas. They could have had a bidding war with any other team in the league. You cannot look back with 20/20 vision and criticize a cap clearing move that made it possible to sign a FA and say they cleared too much cap because the FA signed for less than the entire cap space.
That’s just bad analysis.
No offense but thinking that this deal was negotiated after free agency opened is naive. Trading the pick did not free up the money needed to sign Jalen and it is extremely unlikely they didn't know exactly what they needed. It was likely made to increase the amount of draft capital available in a Mitchell trade. That didn't happen. The picks still could help in another trade or be used. They are not worthless. The Knicks did not need to trade out to sign Jalen though
EwingPSD wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
Assuming for a money that your math works, without checking roster holds and cap holds, they didn’t KNOW that all they would need was $25mm when they made that cap clearing trade. They could have been in a bidding war with Dallas. They could have had a bidding war with any other team in the league. You cannot look back with 20/20 vision and criticize a cap clearing move that made it possible to sign a FA and say they cleared too much cap because the FA signed for less than the entire cap space.
That’s just bad analysis.
No offense but thinking that this deal was negotiated after free agency opened is naive. Trading the pick did not free up the money needed to sign Jalen and it is extremely unlikely they didn't know exactly what they needed. It was likely made to increase the amount of draft capital available in a Mitchell trade. That didn't happen. The picks still could help in another trade or be used. They are not worthless, they just were not received in a trade that led to us signing Jalen Brunson.
we had zero cap space going into that draft. And if we drafted someone at #11 it would have been negative cap space. Not sure how you can say shedding $13m wasn't a huge part of getting Brunson, and DET then took on another $18m from us later on in the 2nd trade. Do they do that without the rapport we had established with them? Who knows, but we needed that $13m to sign Brunson.
nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
They did not, that trade cleared about 13m between Kemba and the #11 picks salary. We were right at the salary cap before the trade. We still needed to move Burks and Noel to create room for Brunson but without unloading the first 13m in that trade we wouldn't have enough.
All in all DET was the team that really helped us land Brunson and it was b/c we got them their man in Duren.
We did. You are pretending without moving 11 nothing else can happen. They did not need to move a lottery pick to get off a small expiring deal. They traded the pick to increase their war chest for a trade.
EwingPSD wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
Assuming for a money that your math works, without checking roster holds and cap holds, they didn’t KNOW that all they would need was $25mm when they made that cap clearing trade. They could have been in a bidding war with Dallas. They could have had a bidding war with any other team in the league. You cannot look back with 20/20 vision and criticize a cap clearing move that made it possible to sign a FA and say they cleared too much cap because the FA signed for less than the entire cap space.
That’s just bad analysis.
No offense but thinking that this deal was negotiated after free agency opened is naive. Trading the pick did not free up the money needed to sign Jalen and it is extremely unlikely they didn't know exactly what they needed. It was likely made to increase the amount of draft capital available in a Mitchell trade. That didn't happen. The picks still could help in another trade or be used. They are not worthless, they just were not received in a trade that led to us signing Jalen Brunson.
We all knew there was interest when they hired Rick Brunson, but you can’t assume anything is final until they actually sign on the line that is dotted.
EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
They did not, that trade cleared about 13m between Kemba and the #11 picks salary. We were right at the salary cap before the trade. We still needed to move Burks and Noel to create room for Brunson but without unloading the first 13m in that trade we wouldn't have enough.
All in all DET was the team that really helped us land Brunson and it was b/c we got them their man in Duren.
We did. You are pretending without moving 11 nothing else can happen. They did not need to move a lottery pick to get off a small expiring deal. They traded the pick to increase their war chest for a trade.
DET took on Kemba's salary because they wanted Duren.
The trade was to add picks for the future of course, but it was also to clear cap.
Clearing cap for Brunson was just icing on the cake though, getting those future 1sts for #11 in a bad draft was a huge win on it's own.
The only reason why the New York Knicks used their No. 11 pick in the 2022 NBA Draft to unload Kemba Walker’s $9.2 million contract in exchange for three future first-round picks was to start to pave a way to sign Jalen Brunson in free agency, right?
A day after the draft, Marc Stein confirmed what we all suspected. After New York wasn’t able to trade up into the top five for Jaden Ivey, the Knicks’ front office shifted their focus from the No. 11 pick to free agency, which begins next week.
nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
They did not, that trade cleared about 13m between Kemba and the #11 picks salary. We were right at the salary cap before the trade. We still needed to move Burks and Noel to create room for Brunson but without unloading the first 13m in that trade we wouldn't have enough.
All in all DET was the team that really helped us land Brunson and it was b/c we got them their man in Duren.
We did. You are pretending without moving 11 nothing else can happen. They did not need to move a lottery pick to get off a small expiring deal. They traded the pick to increase their war chest for a trade.
DET took on Kemba's salary because they wanted Duren.
The trade was to add picks for the future of course, but it was also to clear cap.
Clearing cap for Brunson was just icing on the cake though, getting those future 1sts for #11 in a bad draft was a huge win on it's own.
The 11th pick is not the going rate for dumping an 8 million dollar expiring. If it was we wouldn't have gotten draft capital in return for Kemba and 11. It also was not a weak draft. The only guy that looks like a bust is Davis
EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
They did not, that trade cleared about 13m between Kemba and the #11 picks salary. We were right at the salary cap before the trade. We still needed to move Burks and Noel to create room for Brunson but without unloading the first 13m in that trade we wouldn't have enough.
All in all DET was the team that really helped us land Brunson and it was b/c we got them their man in Duren.
We did. You are pretending without moving 11 nothing else can happen. They did not need to move a lottery pick to get off a small expiring deal. They traded the pick to increase their war chest for a trade.
DET took on Kemba's salary because they wanted Duren.
The trade was to add picks for the future of course, but it was also to clear cap.
Clearing cap for Brunson was just icing on the cake though, getting those future 1sts for #11 in a bad draft was a huge win on it's own.
The 11th pick is not the going rate for dumping an 8 million dollar expiring. If it was we wouldn't have gotten draft capital in return for Kemba and 11. It also was not a weak draft. The only guy that looks like a bust is Davis
it's not the going rate at all, which is why we got 3 future 1sts in addition, which IMO is well above the going rate.
We killed two birds with that 1 trade. Acquire future picks, + clear $13m in cap. Not sure how anyone can argue that.
nycericanguy wrote:https://dailyknicks.com/2022/06/24/knicks-rumors-new-york-reportedly-signing-jalen-brunson-free-agency/The only reason why the New York Knicks used their No. 11 pick in the 2022 NBA Draft to unload Kemba Walker’s $9.2 million contract in exchange for three future first-round picks was to start to pave a way to sign Jalen Brunson in free agency, right?
A day after the draft, Marc Stein confirmed what we all suspected. After New York wasn’t able to trade up into the top five for Jaden Ivey, the Knicks’ front office shifted their focus from the No. 11 pick to free agency, which begins next week.
FANSIDED
nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:nycericanguy wrote:EwingPSD wrote:Knixkik wrote:nycericanguy wrote:sounds like Giannis can see the handwriting on the wall.Always said that '25 MIL pick could be golden.
Jrue, Middletown and Brook are all old, and becoming more injury prone.
MIL does not have the assets to replace those guys.
getting that pick along with 2 other 1sts and clearing the cap for Brunson was a great trade. Rose doesn't get enough credit for it.
Even if the WSH pick turns into 2 early 2nd's, it's still a great trade.
I think the Knicks picks (besides the Washington one) will become more valuable over time. That Detroit pick should be solid. Detroit will eventually make a jump but not enough where it’s a low pick. And that Milwaukee pick becomes intriguing as it’s only top 4 protected.
Was just listening to someone talk about our picks.
We have all our own picks.
Next year we have Dallas unless it's top 10. I doubt it will be. We should get their pick next year
Det pick is also due next year but is top 18 protected(probably won't convey), top then top 13 (maybe), top 11, and top 9. I think this pick won't convey the next two years but probably will eventually.
Wash: top 12, 10, 8. They are kind of a mess but have a new FO. I think this one is a wild card.
Bucks in 2025 (top 4 protected)should convey
I think that is accurate
when its all said and done we could end up with a lotto pick from MIL, a 15-ish pick from DET, two early seconds in the low 30's from WSH, and of course we signed Brunson with the cleared cap.
All for the #11 pick in what was a very weak draft. That was a franchise altering trade.
And if other teams don't want those "protected" picks, even better, send our own unprotected and keep the protected ones for ourselves.
They had the cap to sign Brunson without trading the pick. They signed Isiah Hartenstien with the money cleared and it's shaping up to be a very good draft. I mean Johnny Davis sucks ass but otherwise....
They did not, that trade cleared about 13m between Kemba and the #11 picks salary. We were right at the salary cap before the trade. We still needed to move Burks and Noel to create room for Brunson but without unloading the first 13m in that trade we wouldn't have enough.
All in all DET was the team that really helped us land Brunson and it was b/c we got them their man in Duren.
We did. You are pretending without moving 11 nothing else can happen. They did not need to move a lottery pick to get off a small expiring deal. They traded the pick to increase their war chest for a trade.
DET took on Kemba's salary because they wanted Duren.
The trade was to add picks for the future of course, but it was also to clear cap.
Clearing cap for Brunson was just icing on the cake though, getting those future 1sts for #11 in a bad draft was a huge win on it's own.
The 11th pick is not the going rate for dumping an 8 million dollar expiring. If it was we wouldn't have gotten draft capital in return for Kemba and 11. It also was not a weak draft. The only guy that looks like a bust is Davisit's not the going rate at all, which is why we got 3 future 1sts in addition, which IMO is well above the going rate.
We killed two birds with that 1 trade. Acquire future picks, + clear $13m in cap. Not sure how anyone can argue that.
What I argued was that they did not "need" to trade 11 to have the cap space needed to sign Brunson and that the draft wasn't weak
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/bobbymarks42/status/1695473323860255160?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the Tweet
martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/bobbymarks42/status/1695473323860255160?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the Tweet
Very wired team. They could be in the playoffs or the worst team in the league
EwingPSD wrote:martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/bobbymarks42/status/1695473323860255160?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the TweetVery wired team. They could be in the playoffs or the worst team in the league
If you focus on LaMelo Ball as the focal point of their offense, I think they can be fun and athletic and the get crushed in crunch time.
Ball
___
Miller
Bridges/Washington
___
I might be crazy, but this is how I see this team. If I were them I might actually take a flyer on Fournier. He doesn’t make them worse and he spreads the floor a bit for LaMelo to have fun.
I dunno. I have them in the bottom 4 teams of the league anyway.
EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/bobbymarks42/status/1695473323860255160?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the TweetVery wired team. They could be in the playoffs or the worst team in the league
If you focus on LaMelo Ball as the focal point of their offense, I think they can be fun and athletic and the get crushed in crunch time.
Ball
___
Miller
Bridges/Washington
___I might be crazy, but this is how I see this team. If I were them I might actually take a flyer on Fournier. He doesn’t make them worse and he spreads the floor a bit for LaMelo to have fun.
I dunno. I have them in the bottom 4 teams of the league anyway.
Charlotte and Indiana both seem to have similar teams, both can be bad or greatly improved. When you have a talented point guard like Ball and Haliburton you can't be counted out.
EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/bobbymarks42/status/1695473323860255160?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the TweetVery wired team. They could be in the playoffs or the worst team in the league
If you focus on LaMelo Ball as the focal point of their offense, I think they can be fun and athletic and the get crushed in crunch time.
Ball
___
Miller
Bridges/Washington
___I might be crazy, but this is how I see this team. If I were them I might actually take a flyer on Fournier. He doesn’t make them worse and he spreads the floor a bit for LaMelo to have fun.
I dunno. I have them in the bottom 4 teams of the league anyway.
They easily could be. Hayward could also play 70 games, the wife beater could pick up where he left off, Scary Terry could move back too an off ball roll and be a high volume high % shooter/scorer, and Mark Williams could start looking like a mini Mitch. Add in PJ, Brandon Miller, plus that French guard they signed and while they need things yo break right they have the talent for a turnaround
EwingPSD wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/bobbymarks42/status/1695473323860255160?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the TweetVery wired team. They could be in the playoffs or the worst team in the league
If you focus on LaMelo Ball as the focal point of their offense, I think they can be fun and athletic and the get crushed in crunch time.
Ball
___
Miller
Bridges/Washington
___I might be crazy, but this is how I see this team. If I were them I might actually take a flyer on Fournier. He doesn’t make them worse and he spreads the floor a bit for LaMelo to have fun.
I dunno. I have them in the bottom 4 teams of the league anyway.
They easily could be. Hayward could also play 70 games, the wife beater could pick up where he left off, Scary Terry could move back too an off ball roll and be a high volume high % shooter/scorer, and Mark Williams could start looking like a mini Mitch. Add in PJ, Brandon Miller, plus that French guard they signed and while they need things yo break right they have the talent for a turnaround
I guess the real MVP will be their PR department if they don’t implode. Can you just imagine an argument between Brandon Miller and Miles Bridges over who is the worse d-bag?
EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:EwingPSD wrote:martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/bobbymarks42/status/1695473323860255160?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the TweetVery wired team. They could be in the playoffs or the worst team in the league
If you focus on LaMelo Ball as the focal point of their offense, I think they can be fun and athletic and the get crushed in crunch time.
Ball
___
Miller
Bridges/Washington
___I might be crazy, but this is how I see this team. If I were them I might actually take a flyer on Fournier. He doesn’t make them worse and he spreads the floor a bit for LaMelo to have fun.
I dunno. I have them in the bottom 4 teams of the league anyway.
They easily could be. Hayward could also play 70 games, the wife beater could pick up where he left off, Scary Terry could move back too an off ball roll and be a high volume high % shooter/scorer, and Mark Williams could start looking like a mini Mitch. Add in PJ, Brandon Miller, plus that French guard they signed and while they need things yo break right they have the talent for a turnaround
I guess the real MVP will be their PR department if they don’t implode. Can you just imagine an argument between Brandon Miller and Miles Bridges over who is the worse d-bag?
I'm not high on Miller as a player, but I don't consider him d-bag. It wasn't his gun and he didn't return it knowing that his teammate was going to shoot an innocent single mother. Did he show good judgement? That's questionable. But I would not throw him in the same sentence as Bridges.