Knicks · How SWEEP it is! (page 2)

NYStateOfMind wrote:I'm willing to offer Sims.

Nalod wrote:

KnickDanger wrote:What if's are hard to avoid thinking about under the circumstances, but as they say it is what it is. Drawing dramatic conclusions seems pointless, though that is what we do. The hope is the injury gods are appeased and next year we kick everyone's butt. In the meantime f@%k the Pacers. And the Celtics. And the Mavs. And....

Need we offer a sacrifice to appease the gods further?

offer Nalod!

Cannot think of a *NON NBA Champion which PACER-MAKER org and team qualifies more deserving of a clean sweep! NBA East
conference semifinals style!

DJ is not a dummy whenever Indy Pacers win NBA Title I will give them Pacers just due!
Until then team, stars & org. can GO Kiss m_ Arr_sse they can keep on failing to the sun shines on the moon.
These young studs talented as T.Haliburton but come on now they jump up and down for cameras while game going on posing
for themselves and selfish 'me' attitudes. That's what's wrong with sports today! You ain't win the big one Pacers but
had a pretty decent season, so kudos' for Knicks getting to play in Game 7 falling short.

#SWEPTAWAY
#SWEPTAWAY
#SWEPTAWAY

WE Our Knickerbockers DID NOT GET SWEPT AWAY!
that's it!

Chandler wrote:

NYStateOfMind wrote:I'm willing to offer Sims.

Nalod wrote:

KnickDanger wrote:What if's are hard to avoid thinking about under the circumstances, but as they say it is what it is. Drawing dramatic conclusions seems pointless, though that is what we do. The hope is the injury gods are appeased and next year we kick everyone's butt. In the meantime f@%k the Pacers. And the Celtics. And the Mavs. And....

Need we offer a sacrifice to appease the gods further?

offer Nalod!

its been done already.
They got tired of me and sent me back to keep some of you honest.

Nalod wrote:

Chandler wrote:

NYStateOfMind wrote:I'm willing to offer Sims.

Nalod wrote:

KnickDanger wrote:What if's are hard to avoid thinking about under the circumstances, but as they say it is what it is. Drawing dramatic conclusions seems pointless, though that is what we do. The hope is the injury gods are appeased and next year we kick everyone's butt. In the meantime f@%k the Pacers. And the Celtics. And the Mavs. And....

Need we offer a sacrifice to appease the gods further?

offer Nalod!

its been done already.
They got tired of me and sent me back to keep some of you honest.

Is "they" a reference to Mrs. Nalod?

Philc1 wrote:We beat the pacers if we have any depth.

They had depth. They needed players.

BigDaddyG wrote:

Nalod wrote:

Chandler wrote:

NYStateOfMind wrote:I'm willing to offer Sims.

Nalod wrote:

KnickDanger wrote:What if's are hard to avoid thinking about under the circumstances, but as they say it is what it is. Drawing dramatic conclusions seems pointless, though that is what we do. The hope is the injury gods are appeased and next year we kick everyone's butt. In the meantime f@%k the Pacers. And the Celtics. And the Mavs. And....

Need we offer a sacrifice to appease the gods further?

offer Nalod!

its been done already.
They got tired of me and sent me back to keep some of you honest.

Is "they" a reference to Mrs. Nalod?

She is a goddess, so perhaps!

Philc1 wrote:This pacers team wasn’t that good if we had any depth at all we win that series

We spend hours evaluating all kinds of facts, figures, and nuances and all the while a simple sentence by the parrot in the room brilliantly condenses it all into one brief thought.

Might even improve on it: "if the knicks scored more points in game seven we'd have won the series"!
Lets do more: "Indy lost to Boston because they either failed to defend down he stretch or score points when needed".

Simple, concise, arrogantly elegant all at the sametime. Fucking brilliant!!!!

Nalod wrote:

Philc1 wrote:This pacers team wasn’t that good if we had any depth at all we win that series

We spend hours evaluating all kinds of facts, figures, and nuances and all the while a simple sentence by the parrot in the room brilliantly condenses it all into one brief thought.

Might even improve on it: "if the knicks scored more points in game seven we'd have won the series"!
Lets do more: "Indy lost to Boston because they either failed to defend down he stretch or score points when needed".

Simple, concise, arrogantly elegant all at the sametime. Fucking brilliant!!!!

This pacers team is nowhere near as good as the team that eliminated us in 2013 or those Reggie Miller pacers teams we had the rivalry with in the 90’s. But I guess you need a 10,000 word essay to understand that

Philc1 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

Philc1 wrote:This pacers team wasn’t that good if we had any depth at all we win that series

We spend hours evaluating all kinds of facts, figures, and nuances and all the while a simple sentence by the parrot in the room brilliantly condenses it all into one brief thought.

Might even improve on it: "if the knicks scored more points in game seven we'd have won the series"!
Lets do more: "Indy lost to Boston because they either failed to defend down he stretch or score points when needed".

Simple, concise, arrogantly elegant all at the sametime. Fucking brilliant!!!!

This pacers team is nowhere near as good as the team that eliminated us in 2013 or those Reggie Miller pacers teams we had the rivalry with in the 90’s. But I guess you need a 10,000 word essay to understand that

Thats where you went?

We had depth. Then it was negated by injuries. Thats how we got as far as we did. Your insinuation that we did not. Our Depth could not match their full roster. I get that.
What does that have to do with 2013 or 1990's?