Knicks · Cap nerdiness regarding Paul George possibility (page 2)

Panos wrote:

knixkik
Knicks would essentially send Randle to LA and PG comes back to the Knicks. Additional draft compensation to the clippers as needed.

Why are we including "additional draft compensation" when trading a younger All NBA player for an older one for double the money?
We're bailing them out and they get draft capital? How about the other way around for once? Why do we have to be the stooges?

I put as needed. I honestly don’t know what would be required. PG is older but a much better player obviously.

Not enough for Clips? They’d want some draft picks

I'd have to vote no George and his desired for year extension. Lebron and the pharmaceutical jokes aside, it'd be madness to count on a guy who relies on athleticism to keep producing well into his late 30s.

Well I had the second half of the plan right. But scratch the first half.

I hope Mikal means any thoughts of PG are done.

ToddTT wrote:I hope Mikal means any thoughts of PG are done.

Given the bridges move was first it probably means no real way to get PG.

George is too old and too expensive