Knicks · I see melo staying for another yr, makes the most sense (page 3)
Gudris wrote:Vmart wrote:If Melo stays past this summer it will be a disaster. They might as well buy him out at that point.
I dont think so, if Melo stays, he should play his ass off every game just to prove that Phil is not right, if he stays and we still loose games it will be disaster for Melo. I think he understand this very well know. I think Melo is very capable of playing team basketball, he just need stop thinking he is only savior on a team, thats it.
This is like saying that Trump has to do stuff for the middle class to prove that he cares. In reality it's the middle class that cares about Trump (for all the wrong reasons), not the other way round. Just look around on this forum - there are 10 million threads showing that everything Phil does or says is wrong. What proof is required for these people? Can't fix stupid.
knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:Perhaps they don't trade Melo but I think there will be a LOT of trade discussions going on from more teams than you might think. They're most likely hammering away at all kinds of scenarios to make the trade work including multi team trades. I'd say the odds of a trade are extremely high. Phil wants to be free of Melo and there will be teams that would want to add Melo. My guess is that LAC is working overtime trying to figure out a way to get Melo and resign CP3.Melo to the clippers doesn't make them better, every NBA analysis has already stated this, and JJ is a FA, blake is an injury waiting to happen and if he opts out he's not even a trade chip, the cavs are not giving up anybody or then end of the bench guys, the Celtics can fill their needs with this coming (likely 1 or 2 overall) in the draft. they are more less looking for a big man.
To add on, after listening to kobe and Jordan over the last few wks about their rocky relationship with phil, but in the end it was all mind games. phil is not releasing him, it would be the dumbest move in NBA history, nobody waives a player with 55 million on the books.
Phil is not building a 35 win team this summer, and phil already knows KP isn't close to being ready for a bigger role at the expense of winning, plus he is clearly not that durable.
Melo miss just 2 or 3 games due to injury this season , that's more than any of the top 20 players in the NBA
If we don't get decent return, we should not make the trade, it is simple enough. Rivers and Crawford, or a pick into the next millenium are not decent return. And I doubt anyone will offer us anything better.
EnySpree wrote:How can a playoff team... any of them especially the top 8.... add Carmelo Anthony to their roster without losing a starter and not get better? Please explain that to me....
It depends on his health, ageing, and mindset. If Melo plays next year like he did this year, he will make any team he joins worse.
fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another year
We'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
crzymdups wrote:Nalod wrote:Its business. Fans take it personal. We love the drama and think we know whats up.
Phil didn't kill his value, his NTC did. Every team has reams of video and knows whats good about his game, and what isn't.
If there are teams that want him, his value goes up. If not, we get little in return. ITs not about team secrets or hidden personality traits.
The guy is not a multifaceted player. He rarely was. he is an elite scorer and thats still a valuable commodity for the right team.Trades are still negotiations. If you go into a negotiation and the other side knows you are desperate, it's not going to be a great negotiation.
Look at our record the last few years. The other side is not stupid. Melo is 33, two years on contract and he holds the ball.
All GM's know whats up with other teams. Its their job. Even before its media. Agents know and they talk.
Any GM that inquires about Melo wants to steal him. True with any player on any team. the question is "DEMAND".
Even if desperate, fair value will rise as teams bid him up. But if there is not an active market to bid, then his value is flat.
Is that because we are desperate? Or his cap hit is nearly a third of most teams payroll?
Here is what we don't know: Is melo anything else than what we read and see? He has not publically pushed back on Phil (Holding the ball is not insulting) nor has he been written to be a lockerroom cancer or a problem. Personally, I like the guy. On the court, he is super talented. Its just that he says things and does not back them up regarding team ball. If the system does not suit him, he is not down with hit.
He did well with Woodson because knicks gave him what he wanted. MDA could not get him to buy in.
franco12 wrote:YOU dont see because you cant envision anything positive happening for the Knicks. Melo will most certainly be gone, and he has said point blank when not wanted he will move on.fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
People that think he's going to ride it out or play Phil tough no nothing about Melo and simply have no paid attention to his career. Melo above all else wants to be wanted. Doc Rivers said point blank the Clippers would trade for him and his exact quote was "all those trades mentioned in the papers.. we would have done those trades."
So no.. he may say he wants to stay but never says he is.
Melo will give the Knicks a list of teams.. probably a small list, like Lakers, Clippers, Celtics and Cavs. Knicks will call those teams find the best offer and pull the trigger. This should not be hard to envision.
franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
IDK what to expect. I could imagine Phil doing a terrible deal just to avoid having to Melo back.
Bonn1997 wrote:franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
IDK what to expect. I could imagine Phil doing a terrible deal just to avoid having to Melo back.
We gave up a ton to get him, we got three years of his 5 year deal, and ANYTHING IS BETTER THAN NOTHING!
The last three years have been epic disappointment. We only had one pick in three so it was a decent concept to keep him and try to be decent.
Did Melo comply during his negotiation and say he trusted phil, and wanted in on the triangle? I thought he did. I thought he might have even tried.
Melo didn't work, some of phils things did not work, Kerr did not sign here, Fish was not ready to be a head coach in all aspects.....Things have not gone as expected.
That does not mean it never will. We own our picks.
http://dailyknicks.com/2017/05/02/new-yo...
Can't undue whats been done, but we are building the right way.
fishmike wrote:franco12 wrote:YOU dont see because you cant envision anything positive happening for the Knicks. Melo will most certainly be gone, and he has said point blank when not wanted he will move on.fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
People that think he's going to ride it out or play Phil tough no nothing about Melo and simply have no paid attention to his career. Melo above all else wants to be wanted. Doc Rivers said point blank the Clippers would trade for him and his exact quote was "all those trades mentioned in the papers.. we would have done those trades."
So no.. he may say he wants to stay but never says he is.
Melo will give the Knicks a list of teams.. probably a small list, like Lakers, Clippers, Celtics and Cavs. Knicks will call those teams find the best offer and pull the trigger. This should not be hard to envision.
I can envision something good happening, but what in the last 15+ years of being a Knick fan can you point to that would support a positive outcome?
Look, I do believe this squad with parts added can play competitive (not winning) fun ball. We saw flashes of it this year. But I have a hard time saying that Melo will get traded with 100% certainty.
franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:franco12 wrote:YOU dont see because you cant envision anything positive happening for the Knicks. Melo will most certainly be gone, and he has said point blank when not wanted he will move on.fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
People that think he's going to ride it out or play Phil tough no nothing about Melo and simply have no paid attention to his career. Melo above all else wants to be wanted. Doc Rivers said point blank the Clippers would trade for him and his exact quote was "all those trades mentioned in the papers.. we would have done those trades."
So no.. he may say he wants to stay but never says he is.
Melo will give the Knicks a list of teams.. probably a small list, like Lakers, Clippers, Celtics and Cavs. Knicks will call those teams find the best offer and pull the trigger. This should not be hard to envision.
I can envision something good happening, but what in the last 15+ years of being a Knick fan can you point to that would support a positive outcome?
Look, I do believe this squad with parts added can play competitive (not winning) fun ball. We saw flashes of it this year. But I have a hard time saying that Melo will get traded with 100% certainty.
We are truly a damaged group and there is nothing easy about being a knick fan.
Phil can dump Melo which puts us on part with letting him walk three years ago. Question is defining what is a good deal for him. I suppose starting from zero and working down.
Is there any negative? He stays and disrupts? No evidence he is that guy. I've lost hope he will adapt. Its just time to move on. I trusted Melo and trusted Phil three years ago when he signed back on.
fishmike wrote:franco12 wrote:YOU dont see because you cant envision anything positive happening for the Knicks. Melo will most certainly be gone, and he has said point blank when not wanted he will move on.fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
People that think he's going to ride it out or play Phil tough no nothing about Melo and simply have no paid attention to his career. Melo above all else wants to be wanted. Doc Rivers said point blank the Clippers would trade for him and his exact quote was "all those trades mentioned in the papers.. we would have done those trades."
So no.. he may say he wants to stay but never says he is.
Melo will give the Knicks a list of teams.. probably a small list, like Lakers, Clippers, Celtics and Cavs. Knicks will call those teams find the best offer and pull the trigger. This should not be hard to envision.
I'd be interested in seeing your vision of what an equitable trade with those 4 teams might look like, given that is is not difficult.
ESOMKnicks wrote:The Clippers do not have future picks. Isn't their first tradeable pick a 2021 one? That one will be for our kids and grandkids to cheer about.If we don't get decent return, we should not make the trade, it is simple enough. Rivers and Crawford, or a pick into the next millenium are not decent return. And I doubt anyone will offer us anything better.
I'd accept that deal. That 2021 pick would have to be unprotected, and could be just what we need as KP & Willy hit their prime years, to inject a youthful dose of BOOM into our championship aspirations. Clippers will suck in 2021, so it's gonna be lottery.
Bonn1997 wrote:franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
IDK what to expect. I could imagine Phil doing a terrible deal just to avoid having to Melo back.
I just watch that pavvy video and im starting to re think this thing..
Phil never ever said he didn't want melo here, the MEDIA took the "MELO WOULD BE BETTER PLAYING SOMEWHERE ELSE" to new levels, those headlines got posted on every media sports headlines. BUT he also said this base on his age, his skills, and his window and the direction of the knicks..you could easily conclude that he just stated that as melo's best INTEREST.
He also said..IM NOT GOING TO DUMP HIM with a trade, or waive him, THATS NOT EVEN A OPTION..
knicks1248 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
IDK what to expect. I could imagine Phil doing a terrible deal just to avoid having to Melo back.I just watch that pavvy video and im starting to re think this thing..
Phil never ever said he didn't want melo here, the MEDIA took the "MELO WOULD BE BETTER PLAYING SOMEWHERE ELSE" to new levels, those headlines got posted on every media sports headlines. BUT he also said this base on his age, his skills, and his window and the direction of the knicks..you could easily conclude that he just stated that as melo's best INTEREST.
He also said..IM NOT GOING TO DUMP HIM with a trade, or waive him, THATS NOT EVEN A OPTION..
That's as close to saying I don't want him here as a GM would ever come when discussing a player. Really, it's much closer than a smart GM ever would.
Knickoftime wrote:Well as a starting point we know that Crawford/Rivers for Melo works financially and that Doc Rivers said point blank "we make that trade."fishmike wrote:franco12 wrote:YOU dont see because you cant envision anything positive happening for the Knicks. Melo will most certainly be gone, and he has said point blank when not wanted he will move on.fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
People that think he's going to ride it out or play Phil tough no nothing about Melo and simply have no paid attention to his career. Melo above all else wants to be wanted. Doc Rivers said point blank the Clippers would trade for him and his exact quote was "all those trades mentioned in the papers.. we would have done those trades."
So no.. he may say he wants to stay but never says he is.
Melo will give the Knicks a list of teams.. probably a small list, like Lakers, Clippers, Celtics and Cavs. Knicks will call those teams find the best offer and pull the trigger. This should not be hard to envision.
I'd be interested in seeing your vision of what an equitable trade with those 4 teams might look like, given that is is not difficult.
I like Austin Rivers. I think he's a player that has been trending upward for some time. We also know Hornecek and Phil visited Rivers and recruited him heavily. Jamal Crawford is a very expensive bench scorer. I dont know if you can take a finder for him or not but that is the starting point of your trades. After that you see what the other teams offer.
The Lakers want big talent and Magic will want some star power. Lakers are interesting because they have 3 good young prospects in Russell, Ingram and Randle. They also have some really bad contract in guys like Deng and Mosgov, so some combo there is possible as well.
I dont anticipate the kind of trade that nets multiple picks and prospects, but I dont expect a pure dump either. Knicks will get something back.
knicks1248 wrote:So you have been hammering us with this for months now and your backing off? Dude, Melo's gone. Just let it play out.Bonn1997 wrote:franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
IDK what to expect. I could imagine Phil doing a terrible deal just to avoid having to Melo back.I just watch that pavvy video and im starting to re think this thing..
Phil never ever said he didn't want melo here, the MEDIA took the "MELO WOULD BE BETTER PLAYING SOMEWHERE ELSE" to new levels, those headlines got posted on every media sports headlines. BUT he also said this base on his age, his skills, and his window and the direction of the knicks..you could easily conclude that he just stated that as melo's best INTEREST.
He also said..IM NOT GOING TO DUMP HIM with a trade, or waive him, THATS NOT EVEN A OPTION..
knicks1248 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:franco12 wrote:fishmike wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:its ridiculous. Melo will not be here. But sure.. "we'll see."fishmike wrote:lol @ Melo staying for another yearWe'll see. I think Phil is going to be forced to keep Melo or waive him or take back really bad contracts in a trade. I hope I'm wrong and some GM really wants Melo. I don't think Melo staying is that far-fetched even though it would create a dysfunctional environment. Probably not more dysfunction than we're used to though.
Are you serious?
I mean, how can you not see the possible outcome where Phil fails to trade Melo? Not unrealistic given the fact that Melo's value is at an all time low, his contract is hard to match up, he has a NTC and a trade kicker?
And he's stated just about every time that he wants to stay.
Would it be distracting and dysfunctional if he stayed? Yes. More so than our prior years of dysfunction? Probably not.
The cap is only going up about $9M - to $103M.
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projec...
I don't see a ton of teams having the kind of cap room that they can just acquire Melo without sending back major contracts.
Like Bonn, I hope I'm wrong, and Melo finds a new home for next year.
IDK what to expect. I could imagine Phil doing a terrible deal just to avoid having to Melo back.I just watch that pavvy video and im starting to re think this thing..
Phil never ever said he didn't want melo here, the MEDIA took the "MELO WOULD BE BETTER PLAYING SOMEWHERE ELSE" to new levels, those headlines got posted on every media sports headlines. BUT he also said this base on his age, his skills, and his window and the direction of the knicks..you could easily conclude that he just stated that as melo's best INTEREST.
He also said..IM NOT GOING TO DUMP HIM with a trade, or waive him, THATS NOT EVEN A OPTION..
We'll see what the market bares............