ramtour420 wrote:Alpha1971 wrote:Can the Knicks trade Dallas a future pick or the rights to Rokas for them to remove their protections on the pick ? Maybe future second rounders or Rokas for example ?
If you were Dallas would you do this?
Maybe if they need to have freedom to trade future picks. Plus they may want the recoupment of future pics and a talented player in Rokas. Don't know I m just wondering if that allowed by the regulations.
Alpha1971 wrote:ramtour420 wrote:Alpha1971 wrote:Can the Knicks trade Dallas a future pick or the rights to Rokas for them to remove their protections on the pick ? Maybe future second rounders or Rokas for example ?
If you were Dallas would you do this?
Maybe if they need to have freedom to trade future picks. Plus they may want the recoupment of future pics and a talented player in Rokas. Don't know I m just wondering if that allowed by the regulations.
Right now it's after the trade deadline and before the draft. At draft time they could do a trde with the Knicks just as any other team could do a trade at that time - that exchange could satisfy both teams.
Not sure if tanking is an option for the mavs. The idea of tanking might drive Luka away. Fortunately for the mavs. With the way they are playing even if they want to win, tje wins might not come
Jimbo5 wrote:Not sure if tanking is an option for the mavs. The idea of tanking might drive Luka away. Fortunately for the mavs. With the way they are playing even if they want to win, tje wins might not come
I think luka with the constant technicals is indicating he has semi given up on the season. Porzingis set them back several years. They let Brunson go for nothing and Kyrie is an overrated problem child they probably won’t resign long term
Philc1 wrote:Jimbo5 wrote:Not sure if tanking is an option for the mavs. The idea of tanking might drive Luka away. Fortunately for the mavs. With the way they are playing even if they want to win, tje wins might not come
I think luka with the constant technicals is indicating he has semi given up on the season. Porzingis set them back several years. They let Brunson go for nothing and Kyrie is an overrated problem child they probably won’t resign long term
Thats as strong statement Dr. PhilC.
He literally has done this each the last 3 years. Did he he give up those years also?
I kind of thought Kyrie would leave also until you promoted it as your often wrong about things.
Kyrie is quoted yesterday; https://www.si.com/nba/mavericks/news/da...
They gave up two starters for him, (Dinwiddie and Finny-Smith) which would set them back further.
But Kyrie said he at peace with the trade and sees it long term. My sense is Dallas agreed to a long term deal and money talks. I’d guess he gets traded at some point perhaps when Luka indicates he wants out.
Does one take PhilC or Kyrie at his word? Not really. Kyrie can and frequently changes his mind. Something tells me he has a mulit year offer in his back pocket and i’d have to guess Lakers would only want to pair him with Lebron contract length.
Nalod wrote:Philc1 wrote:Jimbo5 wrote:Not sure if tanking is an option for the mavs. The idea of tanking might drive Luka away. Fortunately for the mavs. With the way they are playing even if they want to win, tje wins might not come
I think luka with the constant technicals is indicating he has semi given up on the season. Porzingis set them back several years. They let Brunson go for nothing and Kyrie is an overrated problem child they probably won’t resign long term
Thats as strong statement Dr. PhilC.
He literally has done this each the last 3 years. Did he he give up those years also?
I kind of thought Kyrie would leave also until you promoted it as your often wrong about things.
Kyrie is quoted yesterday; https://www.si.com/nba/mavericks/news/da...
They gave up two starters for him, (Dinwiddie and Finny-Smith) which would set them back further.
But Kyrie said he at peace with the trade and sees it long term. My sense is Dallas agreed to a long term deal and money talks. I’d guess he gets traded at some point perhaps when Luka indicates he wants out.
Does one take PhilC or Kyrie at his word? Not really. Kyrie can and frequently changes his mind. Something tells me he has a mulit year offer in his back pocket and i’d have to guess Lakers would only want to pair him with Lebron contract length.
They salary dumped Finney Smith which wasn’t a good contract to begin with and Dinwiddie is on the last year of his deal. The mavs didn’t give up much at all for Kyrie and can move on. They are better off without Kyrie and his never ending baggage. Maybe they sign Elf? He did single-handedly get us the 4th seed
Philc1 wrote:Nalod wrote:Philc1 wrote:Jimbo5 wrote:Not sure if tanking is an option for the mavs. The idea of tanking might drive Luka away. Fortunately for the mavs. With the way they are playing even if they want to win, tje wins might not come
I think luka with the constant technicals is indicating he has semi given up on the season. Porzingis set them back several years. They let Brunson go for nothing and Kyrie is an overrated problem child they probably won’t resign long term
Thats as strong statement Dr. PhilC.
He literally has done this each the last 3 years. Did he he give up those years also?
I kind of thought Kyrie would leave also until you promoted it as your often wrong about things.
Kyrie is quoted yesterday; https://www.si.com/nba/mavericks/news/da...
They gave up two starters for him, (Dinwiddie and Finny-Smith) which would set them back further.
But Kyrie said he at peace with the trade and sees it long term. My sense is Dallas agreed to a long term deal and money talks. I’d guess he gets traded at some point perhaps when Luka indicates he wants out.
Does one take PhilC or Kyrie at his word? Not really. Kyrie can and frequently changes his mind. Something tells me he has a mulit year offer in his back pocket and i’d have to guess Lakers would only want to pair him with Lebron contract length.
They salary dumped Finney Smith which wasn’t a good contract to begin with and Dinwiddie is on the last year of his deal. The mavs didn’t give up much at all for Kyrie and can move on. They are better off without Kyrie and his never ending baggage. Maybe they sign Elf? He did single-handedly get us the 4th seed
By all measures, Finney Smith contract is very good value, not a dump. Don't know if he is an elite starter but he is far from making vet starter money; he is making just above the MLE at $13M this year.
Next year on Spencer's contract has already been guaranteed cause of games played: https://www.spotrac.com/nba/brooklyn-net...
martin wrote:Philc1 wrote:Nalod wrote:Philc1 wrote:Jimbo5 wrote:Not sure if tanking is an option for the mavs. The idea of tanking might drive Luka away. Fortunately for the mavs. With the way they are playing even if they want to win, tje wins might not come
I think luka with the constant technicals is indicating he has semi given up on the season. Porzingis set them back several years. They let Brunson go for nothing and Kyrie is an overrated problem child they probably won’t resign long term
Thats as strong statement Dr. PhilC.
He literally has done this each the last 3 years. Did he he give up those years also?
I kind of thought Kyrie would leave also until you promoted it as your often wrong about things.
Kyrie is quoted yesterday; https://www.si.com/nba/mavericks/news/da...
They gave up two starters for him, (Dinwiddie and Finny-Smith) which would set them back further.
But Kyrie said he at peace with the trade and sees it long term. My sense is Dallas agreed to a long term deal and money talks. I’d guess he gets traded at some point perhaps when Luka indicates he wants out.
Does one take PhilC or Kyrie at his word? Not really. Kyrie can and frequently changes his mind. Something tells me he has a mulit year offer in his back pocket and i’d have to guess Lakers would only want to pair him with Lebron contract length.
They salary dumped Finney Smith which wasn’t a good contract to begin with and Dinwiddie is on the last year of his deal. The mavs didn’t give up much at all for Kyrie and can move on. They are better off without Kyrie and his never ending baggage. Maybe they sign Elf? He did single-handedly get us the 4th seed
By all measures, Finney Smith contract is very good value, not a dump. Don't know if he is an elite starter but he is far from making vet starter money; he is making just above the MLE at $13M this year.
Next year on Spencer's contract has already been guaranteed cause of games played: https://www.spotrac.com/nba/brooklyn-net...
Thx for the addition. Helps to clarify the that Mavs did not pay a huge price but Dinwiddie and Finny smith were two starters for them and given how thin the asset base is for them, it was not disposable assets. They were important pieces. They did make conf. finals last year. The move for Kyrie was a gamble. He might bolt. After all, its Kyrie and he does change his mind. But we can't pretend we know whats in his mind or priorities.
Flaky as he is, he does understand his endorsement money is gone and his philanthropic goals require money to accomplish.
Thus, if his outside PASSIONS are more important than championship PASSIONS and Mavs will give him a longer term deal for more money, perhaps that factors in.
So I very much see a path where he does return. Is it a good idea? Hell if know or care. Its the Mavs. I can give a rat's ass.
